Removed by mod

Removed by mod

And I say a plant community is a group of ostensibly indie, bootstrapped musicians who are actually propped up by major labels to sell the image of individuality and independence while having the entire music industry machine behind them.

Had to replace a gear shifter on my road bike recently, not being aware that I'd have to replace the whole cable to do so and then calibrate tension for the derailleur, but similarly to your experience, the whole thing was easier than expected! Folks should definitely try such repairs and maintenance at home to get to know their bikes better, and it's not like it'll cost more to get a pro to do it after you've tried (carefully), if it turns out you can't get the job done yourself.

I guess I may be in the minority then, just since they don't seem quite as drastically different to me in terms of feel and difficulty to shoot with decent/moderate accuracy. I'm not shooting for points though, so I'm not too disappointed by an inch left or right at the range, especially when I'm going to be within 20 feet of any target in any likely self-defense situation. And once I learned to avoid muzzle dip (didn't take longer than a day at the range) the double action doesn't seem too troublesome

Easier to diagnose and fix once you learn everything, but also a lot more that can go wrong/break/jam. I'm just saying that I'd trust a revolver left loaded in a toolbox for 15 years way more than a 10 year old Glock I might see next to it if I needed to grab one and fire.

I don't know that I agree 100%. Shooting any type of gun ought to be practiced if the idea is to be able to defend yourself in the case you ever have to, and a revolver isn't so much more complicated than a pistol that it's going to take much longer to get used to. What do you see as being the most difficult differences?

Coming in with a suggestion that I'm surprised isn't more common: get yourself a revolver.

All guns are "in case of emergency" items (if you aren't a hunter or a plinker). So if you want something that you can leave in a safe/nightstand for 5 years, and then feel completely confident it's going to fire if/when you need it, you need a piece with the fewest possible moving/degradable/high-maintenance parts, which is a wheelgun. If you aren't looking to disassemble and maintain it regularly (or go out to a commercial range/shop and pay to have them do it for you every year or more), it's really the only option you can feel confident in 10 years down the line.

It's also a great first because if you do end up collecting more, you'll still always have a near failproof backup.

Doesn't sound like it was such a solid relationship. He should have been way more loyal to his CEO.

Going to a legit optometrist that either cuts their own lenses or tells you where to get good ones rather than trying to find the cheapest option online is probably the biggest thing. They tend to recommend or automatically go for the other top tips, like avoiding any coating that will ripple/peel/fade over time, using high-index materials for high prescriptions (expensive, but drastically reduced the necessary thickness and curvature + distortion of the crystal), and spacing the lens centers to your personal measurements.

Same exact situation here (incredibly luckily), so I guess I mean "support" not in the sense that my wife isn't excited for me when I find something worth getting, but more that I wish her excitement came from a similar place as mine, a selfish excitement to use whatever is on the way herself, rather than a much sweeter excitement about me being excited lol. And excellent meme, wil certainlyl be sending it along.

I disagree personally. I don't think they need to be side by side to appreciate the difference, so long as you've ever experienced both. I miss the things that I know I'd get with better speakers when I listen on a different setup, and I still enjoy the experience, but it doesn't move me as deeply when I feel something missing. And I don't think it's (all/entirely) placebo. A subwoofer that reaches 10hz lower, moves more air, and fires faster gives you a lot more to hear/feel/appreciate, and to me really changes my physical and emotional reaction to music.

Yeah that's my biggest bummer, too, both in wanting to share the experience and wanting support in dropping some cash on a pair of headphones or something lol.

Agreed that audio improvements are higher priority than video ones imo, but real life visual improvements (e.g., better glasses/prescription, high quality binoculars if you have a use for them) seem at least as significant as audio quality differences.

Pretty much everything about Apple Music is worse than Spotify except for their catalog and their lossless audio, but it was still 100% worth the switch for me. Compression sucks.

This mirrors my experiences exactly. It's just hard for me to understand sometimes that people aren't experiencing a difference that is objectively present and significant. But I guess I may miss plenty of details in other things that are significant to others. My mind goes to frame rate for certain games, where resolution feels super noticeable to me, but the difference between 40 and 60fps just doesn't seem as massive as I see other describing it.

This article references the existence of lots of alternatives for ending the war but doesn't identify any of them. Anyone know what other methods or paths specifically would have led to the war ending in just a few weeks and without an invasion of Japan, as mentioned in the article? Genuinely curious, not arguing the claim.

Probably.

That makes a lot of sense. I think I read the caption differently in the second image, seeing the word "fanatical" as identifying a group within the group rather than describing the whole. Like "an average Muslim won't kill you for it, but the fanatical ones will, so best not to show an image." Maybe wishfu/optimistic interpretation.

That makes a lot of sense. I think I read the caption differently in the second image, seeing the word "fanatical" as identifying a group within the group rather than describing the whole. Like "an average Muslim won't kill you for it, but the fanatical ones will, so best not to show an image." Maybe wishfu/optimistic interpretation.

Yeah that feels obvious now lol. For whatever reason I was focused only on the caption of the first meme and just saw the second as racking on one more group rather than reading into the caption. But I read the word "fanatical" as identifying a group within the group rather than describing the whole. Like "an average Muslim won't kill you for it, but the fanatical ones will." Maybe wishful interpretation.