This is great, even though if I code in Python, I'm not using it for performance reason, but for convenience.
This is great, even though if I code in Python, I'm not using it for performance reason, but for convenience.
It's a bit of a pain to finish, but I'm basically working on creating an array of numbers to assist in sorting unicode characters, and I'm making string processing commands for the G'MIC scripting language. So, that means by hand, I have to sort hundreds of thousands of characters, and I sorted tens of thousands of them already. I already did string_permutations and you can find string_permutations at index or find index which that permutation can be found. However those commands needs the array of numbers for an additional sorting option I'll do.
I only stick with these:
Easy.
For raster graphics image processing, I'd highly recommend G'MIC. Otherwise, Python and especially for string using regex library. I wish there was a vector graphics version of G'MIC.
Well, artists would disagree on that point, and I do agree with the artist. I do think ML at this current state and near future do have a limit. I can't see ML doing anything complicated in 3D like a CAD automobile any time soon.
My crazy take is that there needs to be a interpretative language alternative to Python which uses brackets to define scope and/or things like elif/else/fi/endif/done. Much easier that way in my opinion, and the ";" shouldn't be necessary. I'm used to Python, but if I had another language which can be used to serve similar purpose to Python with those features, I would never code in Python again when it comes up.
Having to code in Julia and G'MIC (Domain-Specific Interpretative language that is arguably the most flexible for raster graphics content creation and editing), they're the closest to there, but they're more suitable for their respective domain than generic ones.
Depends. I use G'MIC (Interpretative language for image processing largely inspired by bash) in CLI.
ig "C:\Users\User..."
If I need something with '$' in CLI, I'd be using $_path_rc\something_something. Sometimes with "" in case of spaces.
Other than that, I would be just running my own coded command in most case.
You mean a interpretative language with similar role to Python, but more like Rust/C++ style? I actually want that so that I can ditch Python even if I learned it and use this instead.