"Resettlenent" of indigenous Palestinians is what the zionazis want.

Or the yanks did it to punish Germany for making the phone call

Meanwhile, the most moral democracy on the west's nice list can brutally murder a six figure number of children and the terf islanders are fine with it.

I think they all deserve eachother

You haven't really lost a Venezuelan election before the yanks declare you the winner.

I'm just here to say it's exactly the same for me.

Just give me Cuban style elections without parties or campaign circus.

They usually do very well when playing little league teams though

"Beans on toast" is a classic English sandwich.

The woke is coming from inside the house.

In two election cycles' time the libs will have rehabilitated Trump completely.

Yup. The western elite is so used to always getting their way and so high on their own propaganda that they have forgotten why and how to do diplomacy. They must seriously think that diplomacy is when the global south surrenders to the west but everyone is wearing a suit and tie as they do so.

If nothing else, a leader who considers himself to be a "deal artist" might at least consider diplomacy before pushing the big war button.

The thing speaking against a forceful Russian response to an American attack is how the war is going. Like all the other Wunderwaffe, ATACMS is not able to conjure away the disparities in manpower and and military industrial capacity. An American missile attack would be a nuisance but it would not fundamentally be able to give the Kiev regime the upper hand, or even "the strongest possible position" for the negotiations more and more people are now accepting will happen at some time on the future.

Russia has found a strategy that works, retaliating in a way that opens up for more direct NATO involvement would jeopardize that without giving Russia much of a material benefit.

The Mileil one could be the poster for a comedy movie

The people of Venezuela are yearning for American military bases and IMF structural adjustment programmes

The exact scope of the American Biden regime's decision to attack Russia with ATACMS missiles is not known in detail. In an interview with state media DR foreign minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen has expressed disappointment in what he believes to be a limited scope of the planned attacks:

If it were true that the U.S. had lifted geographic restrictions, that would be good. But I have a sense that this is relatively limited and likely focused on Kursk. And that’s, of course, better than nothing,

(DR found it fitting to embellish Rasmussen's statement by inserting a note about "Pentagon" claiming that there are 10,000 democratic Korean troops in the Kursk oblast. I have omitted it from the quote)

Even the Danish regime, who has been among the most bellicose, is now beginning to slowly realise that the west will not be able to impose it's maximalist demands on Russia. Rasmussen is now talking about how the purpose of the American ATACMS attacks is not to achieve victory but to make sure that Ukraine has the "strongest possible position for when and if the dynamics of this war change." He goes on to say that "It’s a sober prediction that this could happen sometime in the new year,"

Rasmussen continues:

President Zelensky has also stated that the war will likely shift to a diplomatic phase at some point. And it’s crucial that Ukraine has the strongest possible advantage in that scenario

...

One way to make a difference is to lift geographic restrictions (on the use of Western weapons). Unfortunately, I don’t currently see this happening one-to-one. But something is better than nothing,"

However, the Danish regime has yet to move to a more realistic position on the war. Rasmussen is mostly dismissive of German leader Olaf Scholz' attempts to resume dialogue with Russia by making a phone call to Putin. Rasmussen says:

If the purpose was to persuade Putin to end the war, it clearly didn’t succeed. Because immediately afterward, we saw one of the most massive Russian attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure in a very long time

This, of course, is a deeply unserious statement that should be seen as a symptom of the butthurt many western maximalists must be experiencing these days.

Despite his bruised ego, Rasmussen is enough of an opportunist to realise that the reality of the war is shifting both on the ground and in the imperial court of Washington where the incoming Trump regime might be less keen to continue the war. He says that European countries needs to understand "what's what" and says that "We must avoid a situation where we simply have no role to play. If the call aimed to ensure that, I’m more understanding".

He adds:

There’s nothing from that conversation suggesting President Putin is remotely ready to negotiate."

Horseshoe theory confirmed!

But have you considered that the economy is doing great and that the people struggling with debt should just pull themselves up by the bootstraps and should be blamed and shamed as individuals until they do so?

Russia is a 1990's Hollywood action movie villain who is plotting against the heroic western self-insert for no other reason than their love for chaos.

But is it actual beef or is it some artificial flavouring using petroleum and corn syrup as feedstock?