and I’m sure the person who said “0.1%” wouldn’t either.
Except that by saying that, they have done that. That's the crux of my issue here.
and I’m sure the person who said “0.1%” wouldn’t either.
Except that by saying that, they have done that. That's the crux of my issue here.
Lmao this is why nothing works anymore.
Oh I hope we get snow again here this year!
The devil is in the details, as my cost accounting prof always said!
But it isn't yet. And saying he's in the 0.1% is pointless if you're not talking about wealth, because then you're (not YOU I know) putting the streamer in the same category as billionaire capitalists, which only obscures things further.
ridiculous to say that that kind of income won’t convert to wealth quickly and easily.
I never said that, so that's good
Got the b school degree to prove it, too!
What actually happens is most of it doesn’t.
An assumption on your part.
This discussion exists in a vacuum of facts.
potentially
Yes.
Lotta people in here acting like they've found certainty in this, tho.
At what point are shootings local news and not national
Always imho. There's literally no national significance to a shooting unless they're going on a Bonnie-and-Clyde-esque spree across state lines.
Oh I know! It gets taxed (again, which is actually good btw, "double taxation" is fake news) at the individual rate!
For the record, salary IS income. Both for tax purposes and just like generally.
Hexbear.net needs more people who understand how this works lmao
as he doesn’t make a salary, he makes income
Please explain the difference.
You ever seen helicopter aerobatics? Especially RC ones where the pilot doesn't need to be (as) suicidal? Shit's wild.
Why are expenses missing from this analysis?
:rat-salute: