I got confused near the end. Like I get the parts about the problems with not having a unified theory and deploying contradicting versions of gender when it's convenient, but I was just kind of waiting for it to address the elephant in the room near the end regarding settler colonialism, class, and race which is well, outside the bougie areas of wealthy western countries most people reject the entire field of study. Like how do you fix this without just blowing the entire thing up and maybe using something like the mass line to make new theory with a material base that has motivations more in line with broader society?
I got confused near the end. Like I get the parts about the problems with not having a unified theory and deploying contradicting versions of gender when it's convenient, but I was just kind of waiting for it to address the elephant in the room near the end regarding settler colonialism, class, and race which is well, outside the bougie areas of wealthy western countries most people reject the entire field of study. Like how do you fix this without just blowing the entire thing up and maybe using something like the mass line to make new theory with a material base that has motivations more in line with broader society?