I've gotten tired of weird regex stuff in awk, sed, and grep, so I've moved to perl -E for all but the most basic of things.

1. Codeberg is fully open source(forgejo) while gitlab has an open source core+community edition but a source available propietary enterprize edition.

2. Codeberg is a nonprofit with no ulterior motives. Gitlab is a publicly traded for profit entity with a goal to make profit

3. This could just be me, but codeberg feels a lot more transparent. When they have outages, they explain why.

4. Super minor, but the codeberg team "self-hosts" their own servers so you only need to trust the one entity rather than additionally trusting the server provider.

Sorry, I can't find the blog post. I remember reading something about how zellij's goal was to allow cli apps to create pop-ups, overylay windows and other stuff all in the terminal. Idk where it is though

Zellij - a better way for a cli application to communicate with the terminal

Warp - a terminal emulater that integrates LLM completion natively

Fish - a shell that generates completions automatically from a man-page

Now there are 3 competing standards Edit: 6ish accually

Turing Complete Configuration

• more extensible
• tend to be heavier
• harder to provide detailed error messages
• more difficult for new users

Data Based Configuration

• easier to use
• easier to provide documentation
• lighter to embed
• more limited usecases

Nixos

Pros

• Delarative Config
• largest package repos

Cons

• poor documentation
• cli and package management is in limbo with unstable flakes/cli

In most cases you don't want one. It can make forks confusing and lend malicious actors more credibility than they deserve.

Copyright controls the code. Trademarks are the recognisable names/icons that identify a project.