Proposal to ban AstroGnomeical, posting duplicate comments on multiple posts with no desire for discussion.

You kids and your emojis

Just wanted to make sure, normal people don't send other people kissy face emojis unless they are interested in them.

I hate to break it to you but I'm happily married.

Good to know

I see a mashup comming of what she's promising and what she's done.

The problem with climate zealots is they don't care how they spend others money they just want to see "progress".

So the idiotic rush to save the environment at all costs was wasteful.

OpenSueUs

The most cringe thing about it is worrying about being cringe.

Yup

Than that point is irrelevant.

Saying "for children" doesn't make money appear

It's 40 million dollars

Just a little bit more, it's for a good cause is not a good gauge, any program could be shoehorned into those criteria.

It doesn't take long to overflow the bucket by adding small drops.

Nah, I just don’t care to proof read for somebody who is incapable of understanding what I’m saying from the get go.

Proper English does wonders for communicating your thoughts, you should try it.

No it isn’t. There’s a million reasons why education outcomes are the way they are. You can’t just point to the outcomes and say X reason and X reason alone is the cause.

And yet you are incapable of listing one

Because both groups fall under the umbrella of kids that are struggling.

And once again I've only mentioned the kids that don't want to be there kids that do are irrelevant to this discussion.

That is by definitely an ad hominem. You are attacking me instead of my position.

Your position is "no it's not" you've provided no substance for that claim. The reason you can't is because you're out of your depth.

If that’s how children teach you, no wonder you think that some can’t be taught.

How children teach me? You're going to have to take a little more time before you post your nonsense. Think about what you are trying to communicate before you reply.

That is not a measure of how easy it is to force kids to learn.

It is, at current levels of resources while forcing kids to learn that's the best that can be done.

I never said there wasn’t a difference. But both groups are kids that are struggling.

I have only discussed kids that don't want to be there, why do you keep bringing other groups up.

This is just an ad hominem.

It's not, you really need to brush up on your logical fallacies. I'm saying your lack of experience has made you unable to distinguish two different groups.

Sure you can. Pretty much every student is forced to learn.

It's clear you know nothing about teaching or children. You can't make a kid pay attention. They can be looking right at you and not listen to a single word you say.

That is not a measure of how easy it is to force kids to learn.

If it was possible to force kids to learn all kids graduating the 12th grade would be able to read at 3rd grade level.

A kid that doesn’t want to learn is one of the students that are struggling

There's a big difference between a kid that wants to learn but has difficulties and a kid that doesn't want to learn. Again if you had more experience with teaching or children you might understand this.

You can't force a kid to learn, if you could then 19% of highschool graduates wouldn't be functionality illeterate.

Resources are limited I'd rather apply those resources to kids that are struggling then a kid that doesn't want to learn.