I don't think the empathy of visitors should be a factor at all in the preservation of animals. Don't even let people see them, if you want animals to live close to a natural life as possible keep humans out of the picture. At least half of all arable land should be set aside towards conservation, breeding should always be a last resort.
joebidensexappeal [none/use name]
- joebidensexappeal
- Banned
- 1 Post
- 6 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: November 16th, 2021
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Sea life has a very large habitat range, much farther than birds.
I think we all agree Joe Exotic and Carol Baskins need a good shot to the head.
Disagree, the only reserves of value for animals are nature reserves. We shouldn't bring animals to where they wouldn't naturally be, we should seek to exterminate invasive species, we should even try to end the concept of owning a pet cat or dog and try to reintroduce them into the wild.
What your suggesting is nature reserves which should not have tourists visit it think of Yellowstone but the only people allowed to go there are wildlife experts.
Removed by mod