Miguel, aka mickie. Code, Science, Politics, etc.

EN | ES_MX

blog: mugcake.gitlab.io/blog/ (ES/ desactualizado)

pleroma: migue@kawen.space (no existe mas)

mastodon: miguel@mstdn.mx

Mexico-Tenochtitlan

  • 54 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 22nd, 2020

help-circle




  • Its seems pretty interesting. Now day MediaWiki is one of the largest codebases in PHP out there. But Wikimedia has excellent resources, somewhat extensive, but very good, from the lowest level sections (database, backend) to the style (css), plugins and frontend, including the scripts (lua). Although as @CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml comments that much is done in a very artisanal way, I think more than anything that the correct organization of the main dev, including admins and contributors, a lot of progress can be made with the limited resources available.












  • By simple logic it is not feasible to have a POSITION in a place that is soon under water (the threat of blowing up the dam is real if the liberation forces are still there). Kherson/Kherson is the city, not the oblast. It's one thing to regroup (fix to secure more advantageous positions) and another to retreat (surrender leaving critical positions and outposts).

    What I see here is a huge booby trap; a Pyrrhic victory (reconquer the CITY) having already decimated Ukrainian forces, without human (civilian) shields, the adequate distance from your artillery (the local soldiers left but the other rear positions are intact) without the restriction of containing yourself to avoid civilian casualties and the enormous problem of trying to advance across the Dnieper (the bridges are just bait). In fact, it is attached to the strategy described by a Cuban commander who follows and is studying the events of this conflict; weaken the ukronazi positions, not even destroy them in their entirety, just affect them in such a way that they cannot maintain the positions in the rest of the black sea river (with the icing on the cake called Odessa).

    The media even plays for Russia indirectly (they can't beat the Dombass and now they think they're going for Crimea lol). Since most of the decisions that are being made on the Ukrainian/NATO side are based more on media consensus than military consensus.

















  • Officials point to Twitter’s treatment of posts from the separatist leader Nnamdi Kanu, head of the outlawed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) group. Based in the U.K., Kanu uses Facebook, Twitter, and internet radio streaming to broadcast his separatist messages to Nigerians in the country’s Southeast region. The Nigerian government has complained that IPOB’s “hate messages” have been flagged consistently, but Twitter has said the tweets do not violate Twitter rules.

    I think that promoting the separation of entire countries, specially those how are uncomfortable for western countries, are approve for these "social networks" (Think Tanks). The Nigerian government has a lot of contradictions, specially with the Muslim communities, but IPOB, included Boko Haram (With its active propaganda machine in Twitter/Facebook/Youtube of Africa) plan to create Modern Apartheid states worst than IsraHell. In this sense I agree with the Nigerian government to create a sovereign internet.