Or just don’t cut your hair if you can’t take care of it.

Literal pseudoscientific garbage.

https://michiganentallergy.com/the-truth-about-ear-candling/

Kk

Nah I just disengage with pricks ready to insult and not provide substance. Show me where I disengaged with anyone being polite.

No bad faith at all kiddo. I asked some genuine questions and got attacked for not being a part of the cool kids club or whatever. Y’all on some other shit.

“He asked us our opinion! Bad faif!! Bad faif!!”

the way it’s presented or the information itself?

Well enjoy your circlejerk kiddo. I’m sure you’re all very pleased with yourselves.

Yes, in a jar on my desk.

Do you have anything of importance to say?

That was never the question but go off sister

So much decorum! Is this because you disagree that there’s serious groupthink going on in your community? Because you feel like you have a singular claim to quote this particular author? Some other in-group thing you will be incredibly vague about?

Is that untrue? Or do you just object to the language used?

Ah I see you’d rather it focus on tearing down Mexicans then?

So your primary objection to this reporting is that other countries are immigrating in higher quantities?

So civil

Why do you think it’s sowing Sinophobia? It reads far more anti-Mexican than anti-Chinese.

The Covid data is a glaring omission but doesn’t a few years of lowered immigration tell a much worse story than “this is getting bad now”? Saying this happened a ton before and is starting again paints a much more shitty picture of American border security and a much worse picture of China from an American perspective.

Is it propagating a negative view of China or is it reporting something that most Americans don’t realize is happening? There’s no negative bias in the reporting that I can see. It’s a pretty straightforward account with numbers to back it up. Do you think Americans shouldn’t see information like this?

You don’t want to debate what? I’m not asking for a debate, I’m asking why you disagree with a story that’s pretty straight forward. If you don’t like that this is being highlighted you can just say “I don’t think this is a story that needs to be told” and that’s it. But you keep dancing around why you don’t agree with the story, because…?

I don’t get it man. Here’s a chance to educate someone asking genuine questions about your biases and all of your backs are up because you don’t like anybody asking “why” I guess. Really fucking sad to see.

What is misleading about the importance of the story? It’s happening. The article doesn’t draw any conclusions about what the ramifications are.

Anything being blown out of proportion is happening in your minds, as far as I can tell. The article is basically saying “hey this happens, here’s the numbers” and you’re all acting like that’s a bad-faith argument because… I don’t know why. It’s a weird groupthink thing that I guess I just don’t get.

There’s nothing misleading or incorrect about the reporting here. If you don’t agree with what the author is saying, what data do you have to refute it?

Removed by mod

It’s propaganda because it provides an honest account of what’s happening?

Or it’s propaganda because you don’t think it deserves to be reported on at all?

Honestly those are the only two scenarios I can glean out of your vague in-language laden replies.