Internet user tries not to make everything political challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
Internet user tries not to make everything political challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
None of those points demand the removal of the headphone jack as a compromise.
It's still more waste. An adapter is a bigger use of materials, extra cost, and another point of failure. Hardly a sound decision for a self-proclaimed "sustainable" manufacturer.
The removal of the headphone jack is what made me call complete bullshit on their whole "repairability and sustainability" schtick. At the same time of the removal, they began selling their own wireless earbuds. So now you can't use wired headphones with their phones, and instead have to buy a pair of wireless ones (which they conveniently sell to you) which will eventually have their internal batteries die and need to go to a landfill because none of it is repairable. I initially thought they were a pretty good company with decent values, but ever since they did that I no longer care about them.
Loved using it when I took a brief stint as an Android dev at my company. Later talked to my tech lead to see if he was open to me writing future backend developments in Kotlin but he said it would be too much unneeded work to get the entire team to learn a new language to keep the backend maintainable.
That guy clearly never heard about the Pareto Principle.
E: fuck yeah, successfully triggered all the hexbear tankies. As fun as poking a wasp nest with a long stick. If only there was an online tankie bug spray equivalent...