They should name and shame.
They should name and shame.
If anyone is curious, in the US this is illegal unless the charity is actively displaying the art as part of their charitable mission (I.e. a museum accepts it, and it’s worth displaying).
If it’s for any charity that does not display art, you’re limited to deducting the cost of the item at acquisition ($1,000) which makes this not a loophole at all.
The real problem is we need more IRS agents to investigate whether or not any of the contributions are fraudulent.
I think this belongs in c/nottheonion.
The difference between Hebrew and Latin was that only the Catholic clergy and intellectuals wrote in Latin.
The average Jewish kid could read and write in hebrew. Even if it wasn’t spoken.
Even in Morocco, the dialects spoken were often written with Hebrew characters - including a dialect of Arabic written with Hebrew characters.
They also would have more than a passing knowledge of Hebrew, obviously.
More than a couple centuries - but dead isn’t quite right. While it wasn’t spoken in most Jewish enclaves, it was still used in all religion and quite a lot of commerce and literature. Most practicing Jews knew Hebrew, even if they did not use it in daily life. Jews from different countries often used Hebrew to communicate - mostly in writing because it was the common language they would both know.
Books have been published in Hebrew more or less continuously, including the first printing press in in the Middle East (now in what is Israel) in 1577 printed books in Hebrew.
Hebrew has never been dead - it just wasn’t used because most Jews lived in countries that spoke other languages that Jews learned and often created pidgin dialects like Yiddish (and others).
It is not like a bunch of zionists taught all the worlds’ Jews Hebrew, but if you put a German Jew and a Russian Jew in the same room, the only language they would both know is Hebrew.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_language
Should have given all that money to Palestine instead of wasting it on trying to build an even more luxurious and expensive hotel.
They’re aligning with the US because the other party they could have aligned with has annexed their other ally once already, and then launched a full scale invasion to take more in the last 10 years.
You can say what you want about American democracy and probably be right - but it’s more little d democratic than Russia is currently by leaps and bounds.
One does not need to look at a Supreme Court ruling as a coup to see a dictator at work in Russia.
If there were any advantages to doing so, why not? The issue is there are no advantages and myriad disadvantages to aligning with Russia, if you believe you’re a democratic state.
Why would any democratic state want to align with a totalitarian state unless it was the only option?
“Wait, actions have consequences?” - Russia, probably.
I don’t even know what this means.
Well that’s not very civil.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Officially, Russia is a multi-party representative democracy lol.