Yes, I recall the speeches Biden has given where he rallies the crowd against the Palestinian scourge!
Look, I'm not arguing that the Israelis are doing anything positive, I'm merely suggesting that the venn diagram of people who are thankful that Biden dropped out and people who support genocide is not a circle.
Anyone holding a "Thank you Joe" sign supports the genocide of Palestinians
Have you ever considered that being this much of a reductionist is limiting your ability to understand the true nature of the world around you?
You're standing right here, on Lemmy.zip, not on your home instance, and the comment I was responding to was a response to a different Hexbear user who was literally saying that there is no difference between liberals and Nazis.
If I meant to reply to your comment, I would have done that.
It was incredibly jarring when I first got to Lemmy and started running into nutjobs who seem to be on some sort of crusade, spouting ideas so far out of touch that they're either straight up trolling or they are state propaganda assets from a western adversary. Sometimes when people ask where these people are coming from, I like to provide something of an orientation, as the community will never survive off of nutjobs alone.
First, I appreciate your reference to literal dozens of liberals. 😁
Second, you're right that most liberals don't want revolution. Non-liberals too, for the most part! Unfortunately, in some corners of Lemmy, such as Hexbear or Lemmygrad, the ability to distinguish and discuss nuance is not included in what I would describe as their "community values".
If you're looking for a constructive discussion about policy issues, you're barking up the wrong tree. Alternatively, if you prefer to discuss everything in terms of absolutes, and you love China and tanks, it could be a great time.
Head for the extreme northwest and northeast corners of the country; Alaska and Maine both use RCV, including for presidential elections. It's not 50 states of RCV but it's a start!
It sounds like someone got ahold of a 6 year old copy of Google's risk register. Based on my reading of the article it sounds like Google has a robust process for identifying, prioritizing, and resolving risks that are identified internally. This is not only necessary for an organization their size, but is also indicative of a risk culture that incentivizes self reporting risks.
In contrast, I'd point to an organization like Boeing, which has recently been shown to have provided incentives to the opposite effect - prioritizing throughput over safety.
If the author had found a number of issues that were identified 6+ years ago and were still shown to be persistent within the environment, that might be some cause for alarm. But, per the reporting, it seems that when a bug, misconfiguration, or other type of risk is identified internally, Google takes steps to resolve the issue, and does so at a pace commensurate with the level of risk that the issue creates for the business.
Bottom line, while I have no doubt that the author of this article was well-intentioned, their lack of experience in information security / risk management seems obvious, and ultimately this article poses a number of questions that are shown to have innocuous answers.
Aight, pay up, where's the western media reporting on this?
That sounds like an incredibly large cover-up operation, if true. I've seen the US government in action and I'm here to tell you that they simply cannot contain stories this big. Ukraine has a free press and they have unrestricted access to the internet. If it were as bad as you suggest, why have we not heard of it?
It sounds to me like you need to get your facts straight.
Your title is worded in a way that suggests that Ukrainian citizens are ready to sue for peace, but the actual study doesn't conclude that at all. Vast majorities of those surveyed believe that Ukraine will win the war and restore their original territory.
The options available were, basically, "the war can only end through military means" and "in addition to the military efforts, diplomatic efforts should be taken to end the war". It isn't particularly surprising that people understand that diplomatic efforts are necessary to conclude the war, but this shouldn't be taken as a sign that they're ready to simy give up. Far from it.
Lmfao KHive, I love it.
Friend, you're right, I am missing your point.
I wasn't trying to engage in a conversation with you at any point. I don't know why you keep replying.
We seem to mostly be in alignment on the issue of liberals and Nazis not being the same. I was offering my viewpoint to the original commenter I replied to, just in the same way that you did, when you came at me with this "I'm standing right here" bullshit.
If you're hurt because I've insulted your instance, that's tough. If you hang out with Anarchists all the time, you aren't allowed to get upset if someone calls you an Anarchist. I'm far from the only person who has pointed out the frequency of viewpoints that lack any connection to reality coming out of Hexbear. My comment was a PSA and I won't apologize for calling it out.