so, you have gigabytesper second of disk io, and the game relies on the couple of megaBITS of internet bandwidth most people have to stream textures? As opposed to downloading and installing them once as an update...

This does not pass the smell test.

you mean it doesn't work when the device is turned off? weird! /s

you released it under a non open source license. So very clearly: no it is not

it is only open source if i can build it myself. Which I can't if you just give me the weights.

The weights are the "compiled" version of the dataset. It's the dataset that's the source, not the weights

these actions already admit defeat

the reason there were multiple skus is due to binning. So now they're telling me that they have much better yields where they don't need to bin, where most chips could be top tier, Making it cheaper for them and more expensive for anyone else?

i have one, it's not very good tbh. You would need to modify the software yourself to make it actually practical. some way to lock the screen, some way to vibrate more than one 250ms blip when an alarm is triggered, stuff like that.

could have been between the cat and myself. The cat still gets preference.

nah man, gotta be more specific. When those stuff work on every application.

A screen reader protocol for blind people that requires the app to be recompiled and opt-in to being accessible to accessibility tools, is not a replacement for one that worked for every application. Old apps will become impossible to use for some people with accessibility issues. Though wayland fanboys would tell you to shut up and be happy that a protocol exists, while failing to acknowledge that the protocol is literally fucking useless by design.

fuuk this AI bubble. the browser is one place where ai is not needed

i think the real explanation is simpler and more understandable.

NaN is what you get when you do something illegal like dividing by zero. There is no answer, but the operation has to result in something. So it gives you NaN, because the result is literally not a number

that's still a net saving. 50% of 200% is 100%. 50% of 150% is not.

you don't compare fpgas to just any emulator. But you can compare them to gate level simulators (not emulators). The ones that take a beefy 4GHz+ pc just to emulate a gameboy at 8 fps. But also guarantee 100% accuracy and compatibility with all games. Fpgas can do that in real time.

but.... but..... RUST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

q. e. d.

\s

but why? you'll still measure things in football fields, elephants or "large boulders" so it won't affect you much

"built on an open web framework...."

hard pass then. Why the hell would I want to open a browser instance for a terminal???

there is!

windows xp?

netflix, like valve, can't count to 3

ffs