"In on the hysteria"? TBH this statement sounds like the opposite of that. He says the government knows all about the drones; where they came from, where they went, etc. And he doesn't think they are "the enemy", because they would've been shot down.
The most he says is that the government seems to want to "keep people in suspense" (i.e. not tell people what they are doing).
This is like one of the least hysterical or scaremongering statements I've ever seen the fucker make, actually. He almost sounds "normal".
Hillary Clinton did not attempt another run after losing to Trump in 2016, handing the Democratic torch to one-term president Biden.
Debbie Walsh, director of the center for American women and politics at Rutgers University, told the Post, “landing in general has kind of been harder for women”, noting that women who served at state level positions “don’t get the soft landing of a position in a law firm that allows them to regroup and earn some money and maybe run for something else. They struggle a bit.”
LMFAO did they just do a pity party for Hillary Quarter-Million-Dollar-Speaking-Engagements Clinton, FFS?
Unfortunately, the legal system is extremely good at making sure this doesn't happen. And most people, defaulting to how liberal propaganda tells them is the correct and VeRy ImPorTanT manner of behavior in a setting like a courtroom, will 100% put aside how they feel and even what they personally think about a situation and bend the knee to Da RuLe oF LaW. To think otherwise is just a Lucy-with-the-football scenario, where people have been so hopeful about outcomes in the past, yet been disappointed by the combination of the shitty reality of jury behavior and the judge doing shit like going above and beyond to ensure they don't have the bits of information that are most relevant to making their decision. Like, Rittenhouse should've been jury nullified right into a prison cell no matter what the law said, right?
I do think that the speculation that it is highly likely the system won't even risk the courtroom is probably reasonable, but I also think it's unlikely that the wishful thinking that the correct outcome will happen if it DOES get to a courtroom is probably foolish.
Let's spread the word about jury nullification as much as possible. Always, but especially now. But let's also not let ourselves get complacent by thinking we are anywhere near winning the information and ideology war on even a seemingly "obvious" situation like this one.
Oh. No. By having a minority of companies' boards elected by workers and restricting stock buybacks slightly. Cool, Liz. Very radical. I'm sure this will fix things.
They're already done pilot testing and are rolling out commercial versions of the required machinery.
Nice to be hearing about this when it might actually be feasible and on the threshold of being implemented. So often we hear about supposed breakthroughs like this and it's years before it could ever even theoretically be used...and then we literally never even hear about it again anyway.
Being charitable, they might be calling the decade new, not the warring.
But fuck Kurzgeagt anyway, TBH. Their apologia for capitalism has always been the wet dream of online liberals. I don't expect them to do any better regarding the capitalists' empire either.
Jeffrey Sachs is about as liberal and otherwise problematic as Mearsheimer, but this seems like a pretty good analysis in terms of the geopolitics. (The motivational shit is pretty stupid, though, like thinking that between the U.S. and Israel it is Israel that calls the shots, and not giving the most zealous Zionist over the last 50 years of U.S. politics his due.)
TBH I wouldn't be surprised if he like mapped out the area of the city in CAD to figure out where the target would be visible from, where he could hide the bicycle, and what his route to the park would look like, or some shit like that. It's definitely not beyond the galaxy-brainedness of this kind of techbro (assuming it really was this guy, of course).
EDIT: NVM, I guess. I see the gun allegedly found on him at McDonald's is claimed to be a 3D print.
a CEO willing to surrender their company/wealth to employees or liquidate their for-profit insurance should not be killed
Those who would do this already have. Unless it's at gunpoint. We do not have the capacity to demand it at gunpoint without being absolutely crushed at this point. There is no surrender option until leftist movements get much, MUCH stronger. Until then, there's no point crying over the deaths of the people who are slaughtering us from the boardrooms. This was an act of community defense.
The tactic of (essentially?) turning himself in (if accurate, of course) was certainly pretty stupid and worth criticizing.
But propaganda of the deed is good. Dead CEOs is a way to move toward that different system. Cut away the pretense that this is not a violent system, or that the opposition to it cannot be violent.
Also, they're used to terrorize "material witnesses". Chelsea Manning spent years behind bars for refusing to talk to one.
Here's a relavent article: No Right to Remain Silent - A Third Northwest Activist Who Hasn’t Been Accused of a Crime Is Sent to Federal Prison