pigginz@lemmygrad.ml to shitposting@lemmygrad.ml • edit-21 year ago*Permanently Deleted*trashimagemessage-square69 fedilinkarrow-up1128file-text
arrow-up1128image*Permanently Deleted*trashpigginz@lemmygrad.ml to shitposting@lemmygrad.ml • edit-21 year agomessage-square69 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareculpritus [any]hexbear41·edit-21 year ago Why NATO intervention will not lead to World War 3? Russia can not even win against Ukraine. Why could Russian win a world war? We are 20 times bigger economies and by far better armed. Russia can never win World War 3 link
minus-squareRam_The_Manparts [he/him]hexbear29·1 year agoLove to just imagine that nukes aren't real. link
minus-squareTankiedesantski [he/him]hexbear9·1 year agoIn fairness as soon as nukes get involved, Russia isn't winning WW3 either. Nobody wins, everyone loses. link
minus-squareAnatolianin@lemmygrad.mlhexbear8·1 year agoAccording to libs, Russian nukes either do not exist, or have long rotted and do not work. linkfedilink
minus-squareSoyViking [he/him]hexbear7·1 year agoLook, if Putler fires his nukes we'll just use our bigger economy to stop them. Surely, the invisible hand of the market will keep us safe. link
minus-squareSeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]hexbear21·1 year agothank god, that means we can safely disband NATO. link
Love to just imagine that nukes aren't real.
In fairness as soon as nukes get involved, Russia isn't winning WW3 either. Nobody wins, everyone loses.
Yes exactly.
deleted by creator
According to libs, Russian nukes either do not exist, or have long rotted and do not work.
Look, if Putler fires his nukes we'll just use our bigger economy to stop them. Surely, the invisible hand of the market will keep us safe.
thank god, that means we can safely disband NATO.