• quarrk [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    This pattern occurs with leftist/populist expression all the time. It’s heard by many for what it is, but for others it’s merely a catchy tune or a nice painting. I’ve mentioned the Surrealist art movement a few times here, but that’s another example. Salvador Dalí is ostensibly the face of the movement in the average person’s mind, but the Surrealists and he didn’t get along; he ultimately rejected their political message, believing that he could drop the political baggage and just focus on the abstract aesthetics of the movement. While I wouldn’t say his work was necessarily bad (he still applied his paranoiac critical method inspired by Freud) it didn’t have the same significance as Surrealists imo.

    • Bruja [she/her, love/loves]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dalí only dropped the leftist politics. He was at least a fascist sympathiser and painted hitler a couple of times. The whole ‘apolitical’ thing was on a spectrum of politically unaware liberalism to cryptofascism to overt fascism in denial.

      • DroneRights [it/its]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah well that goes without saying. Apoliticism is fascism, everyone knows that.

      • Fuckass
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • stigsbandit34z [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Damn all of history really is the history of class struggle or something like that