• YuccaMan [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    https://www.liberationnews.org/tiananmen-the-massacre-that-wasnt-2/

    Edit: the other source I was looking for

    https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php

    The thing to get is that there was no massacre on the square, and in fact there's no verifiable evidence that anybody died there at all that day. Many people did die elsewhere, in street clashes with soldiers, after demonstrators killed and burned a few of them.

    I would like to note also that bringing up events like Tiananmen Square, especially heavily propagandized and warped versions of them, without an understanding of the complex political context which led up to them, is not a gotcha, it's just ignorant. Not saying you're doing that or that you would do that, but it's something others do frequently when they invoke it round here.

    • Balefirex [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      US Military Pysops Division literally bragged about how successful they were with Tiananmen in this recruitment video

      https://youtu.be/VA4e0NqyYMw

      Edit: Found out about this video from this article which was linked on hexbear lol https://www.fridayeveryday.com/how-psy-ops-warriors-fooled-me-about-tiananmen-square-a-warning/

      • YuccaMan [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, I remember that. Almost feels like the cocky bastards are mocking us at this point.

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      ·
      1 year ago

      With no actual evidence, it just seems like China's word against the US's. Neither are sources I trust, and both have motives to lie. I'm just going to assume nothing.

      • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can you possibly explain why the western diplomats stationed there told their home countries nothing happened in diplomatic cables?

        Why would they do that if it was real?

      • YuccaMan [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I said there was no evidence that a massacre took place in Tiananmen Square. What actually took place there is well evidenced by eyewitness testimony, a fair bit of which is contained in the two sources I linked.

        Edit: I also take issue with the assertion that both the US and China are equally untrustworthy, particularly when the Chinese government freely admits that violent clashes between civilians and PLA personnel took place that day, something they would certainly have incentive to lie about if they were as untrustworthy as all that.

        • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
          ·
          1 year ago

          I recall seeing eyewitness testimony supporting both sides. Although, its possible the testimonies I saw were about the clashes that China admits to, and were simply framed as being about a massacre. They didn't seem very specific or definitive.

          Even though the Chinese government admits to those violent clashes, its still very plausible they would lie about a massacre. Its much easier to justify that than it would be an actual massacre, especially when the civilians act violently. Its also possible that admitting some aspect of it would benefit them more than complete denial.

          • YuccaMan [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            You'd have a point there, if there wasn't ample photographic evidence which also suggests that no concerted massacre took place, in the square or elsewhere. All available photographic evidence that I've seen supports the Chinese government's version of events: scattered street clashes which unfortunately featured some quite heavy duty violence, but no mass formation of tanks coming in and deliberately schwacking everybody in sight.

            • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
              ·
              1 year ago

              You make convincing arguments, and I'm sure you are correct to some degree. I do not believe that the dramatized events suggested by the west are accurate. But, I still think it was a disgusting waste of life that could potentially be described as a massacre.

              • YuccaMan [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                It wasn't nice, to be sure. The workers' protests which happened concurrently with the events of Tiananmen Square were reportedly the source of much of the violence, and it got properly nasty at times. The two events are often conflated though, and I felt it important to draw that distinction. Anyhow, I appreciate your open-mindedness.

                  • YuccaMan [he/him]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Reactions like yours are why I still bother. All I ever want is for people to look at popular historical and political narratives critically. I apologize if I came off as hostile at all, we get a lot of calumny coming our way, as you might imagine.

              • spectre [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you want to find it more, I often recommend the documentary "the gate of heavenly Peace" which you can find on YouTube. If you want to understand a bit of it's perspective before watching check the reception/controversy section on its Wikipedia page

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I'm sorry, you're actually being reasonable and in good faith. Some other people in your instance have shortened my fuse a bit when i see the @shitjustworks, and you didn't deserve that. I'm going to reign it in, and i apologize again.

            Thanks for genuiniely engaging with other people from hexbear on these issues

        • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, come off it. Your comment was removed because there was no content warning for violent images, which you were told and which is stated in the modlog.

          Here, I'll post your link with a CW and you can watch it stay up.

          CW: Violence, Gore

          https://www.aboluowang.com/2008/0529/89034_3.html

          We don't want this to be a space where people could randomly stumble across images of graphic violence they're not prepared for. You're not being censored by the CPC, dumbass.

      • YuccaMan [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Firstly, we insist on content warnings being applied to violent content of that sort.

        Second, I'm guessing you didn't bother to translate any of this or investigate the sources cited - or lack thereof, since most of these images lack citation or provenance. The one source I was able to follow back was an interview of the man who lost his legs, conducted by right wing rag the Epoch Times and signal boosted by noted CIA cutout Radio Free Asia. Most everything else in there is unsourced, and many of the captions just outright lie about what's being depicted, such as the one claiming the crushed red motorcycle is actually a guy run over on his bike.

        Important to note also, none of these pictures are claimed to have been taken in the square itself. That violence occurred elsewhere is not in doubt; I never claimed there wasn't violence, and the Chinese government themselves acknowledge it. What often gets left out is that the student demonstrators initiated it, and even western journalists working with eyewitness testimony concede that the PLA operated with remarkable restraint until things boiled over.

        Third, and this is a comparatively minor point, the site you link to is a noted right-leaning anti-communist news organization which I suspect has ties to RFA. Even if that weren't the case, it doesn't seem at all trustworthy, given its clear bias against the Chinese government.

        Edit: Upon further investigation, I found that Fang Zheng, the man who claims his legs were crushed by a tank in an unprovoked attack by the PLA, is himself not a very trustworthy source. The one person who he identified as being able to corroborate his claims, declined to do so, saying that she didn't remember being with him at all on the day that violence broke out. Also potentially significant, he's a founder of the Chinese Democracy Education Foundation, a California-based nonprofit opposed to the Chinese government. The organization has worked with RFA, and Fang Zheng himself has attended Falun Gong rallies and apparently shares their insane organ harvesting conspiracy theories.

        Is this really what you're giving us?