Quaxamilliom [comrade/them] to the_dunk_tank • 1 year agolol, lmao evenimagemessage-square147 fedilinkarrow-up1184file-text
arrow-up1184imagelol, lmao evenQuaxamilliom [comrade/them] to the_dunk_tank • 1 year agomessage-square147 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]hexbear41·1 year agoHe's a landlord, that wasn't the house he lived in... link
minus-squareSouthEndSunset@lemm.eehexbear1·1 year agoYes. I read that. Youre not getting my point. linkfedilink
minus-squareGay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]hexbear40·1 year agoThe problem is your orginal statement. "Wanting the law to be upheld only in situations you like" would cover your parents. A law system that would not invoke such a desire cannot exist in a society that still has landlords. link
minus-squareSouthEndSunset@lemm.eehexbear9·1 year agoYeah, we should ban landleeches. Unfortunately that wont happen cause money talks. linkfedilink
minus-squarePbSO4 [comrade/them]hexbear15·1 year agoIf only there was some other place besides money that political power could grow from link
He's a landlord, that wasn't the house he lived in...
Yes. I read that. Youre not getting my point.
The problem is your orginal statement. "Wanting the law to be upheld only in situations you like" would cover your parents. A law system that would not invoke such a desire cannot exist in a society that still has landlords.
Yeah, we should ban landleeches. Unfortunately that wont happen cause money talks.
If only there was some other place besides money that political power could grow from