It may be enlightening to know im autistic

Hmm, you may be right

it's important to take note of what kind of rhetoric is going around chud circles and counter it

c/counterpropaganda is precisely for that

what was the point of this conversation?

Yes, though the difference is minor

yes, but as i said it almost never happened

yes

Those were inattentively copied from the_dunk_tank, i removed reference to that rule 8 in c/gossip now, now instead the rule is just that subjects of a post must be a public person

you will have to be more specific, in what way was i disrespectful?

yes, if they were from federated instances

yes

yes, but we barely if ever saw any posts that used this exception

after rule 8, no, before yes

i dont believe im toxic

yes

thats what functionally same means, that its not literally same

i already explained in what sense it is functionally the same

The purpose of those changes is not to protect the nameless chuds, but to make the content better and less toxic

no

yes, according to you guys the purpose of dunking is for it to be fun and cathartic, it still is if the dunking is on public figures , therefore it is functionally the same