• uralsolo
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • GivingEuropeASpook [they/them, comrade/them]
      ·
      9 months ago

      He denounced specific parts of the attack. The section of international law that explicitly allows violent resistance to a military occupation or blockade doesn't exempt the resistors from the rest of international law. The IDF/Israel and Hamas have the same obligations under international law(s).

      • the_kid
        ·
        9 months ago

        serious question - if Jews in a ghetto during WW2 got together some weapons, revolted, left the ghetto and killed a bunch of German civilians partying right outside the ghetto, would you call it "genocidal" and "terrorism" and say "yes, while Nazi Germany is bad, so are these Jews who committed terrorism"?

          • the_kid
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            it doesn't suck for you to take the high road, you're sitting in the west living a comfortable life, it's super easy for you to 'condemn' both sides and go on with your day. what are Gazans supposed to do? they're living in hell on earth, and the entire world had turned their backs on them.

            peacefully protest? they've tried that

            try to get the word out about how bad their situation is? they've tried that

            what should they have done instead? just do nothing and let Israel keep building settlements and murdering them and commit a slow genocide? I can't blame them for violently struggling in whatever means possible. even under international law, occupied populations have the right to engage in armed struggle. it sucks that it came to this, but Israel is responsible for every death that happens because they want to commit genocide against the native population rather than peacefully coexist.

              • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                ·
                9 months ago

                "First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."

                Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."

                -MLK

                  • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Yes comparable.

                    Saying that Palestinian resistance is only legitimate if it meets the standard of perfect moral purity is exactly saying they should wait around and get genocided.

                    And you know what? They are getting genocided, right now, at this moment, Isreal is carrying out a campaign of extermination that will make October 2023 a subject of history books for centuries to come, and the hill you've chosen to die on is that the Palestinians are also imperfect.

                    Try some reading comprehension on for size btw.

                    Try talking like a normal person and not a smugness overdosing reddit shithead.

                    I say that occupied peoples absolutely have the right to struggle against their oppressor, just not the right to murder civilians indiscriminately.

                    No occupied person cares what you say they're allowed to do, you privileged asshole. No resistance in history has ever risen to your standard anyway.

              • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                ·
                9 months ago

                "And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard."

                -Also MLK

          • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The Jews would have been justified in killing every German they could get their hands on if it could help stop the Holocaust.

            A genocidal society has no right to claim the mercy of a civilian/soldier distinction. They do not recognize it themselves.

            It is a horrible tragedy on a personal level. No one person has any power over the situation they find themselves in, but that is the brutal logic of war. Societies will feel less safe in engaging in targeting civilians if their own are subject to retaliation when they do so.

              • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Violence against Germany literally ended the Holocaust so you are just a clown.

                I guess you would have sent thoughts and prayers to the extermination camps.

                  • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Look at pictures of Germany after the war and tell me it wasn’t violence against Germany. Are you fucking kidding me? Over 500k German civilians died in the bombing raids.

                    “It was just collateral damage” - the words of a fucking coward who refuse to admit what they’ve done

                    It sucks they died but ending the Holocaust and Nazi Germany was a moral necessity.

                      • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        9 months ago

                        This is so absurdly nitpicky I'm not sure what to say. The bombings of Germany DEFINITELY damaged their industry, which helped end the war.

                        Are you really implying that no innocent civilians were butchered by the ground invasion of Europe? (Also, hilariously, you left out that Japan was literally defeated without a ground invasion of Japan. Same war, buddy.)

                        You just seem like you can't accept wars mean violence against a people, not a military/government. It's a child's propaganda understanding of warfare that you have.

                  • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Oh, is leveling Dresden with incindiary bombs targeting "the german government?" Is nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki "targeting the japanese army?"

          • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sitting on the side lines whining about "both sides bad!" during the literal Holocaust is not "taking the high road." It's being an unprincipled coward.

            And MLK had pretty scathing words for people like you.

              • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                ·
                9 months ago

                That's just "both sides bad."

                The fact that you can't tell the difference tells me a lot.

                And the fact that you can't tell the difference tells me even more.

                I'd also argue that it shows you to be the unprincipled one.

                smuglord

                  • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    It's almost like this little thing called nuance exists.

                    It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like It's almost like

                    Oh my fucking God, go back to reddit, please!