Do they think the Catalan Anarchists had no bourgeois blood on their hands? Do they think the Makhnovites never executed counterrevolutionaries? Fucking idiots. I preferred it when anarchists actually threw pipe bombs.

  • Nematodes [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I'm aware of my own post is this some sort of got cha?

    when the weather became less fair.

    Are you talking about when y'all openly bash anarchist? Calling them libs?

    Yeah I'm not really cool with that.

    Your comment has no real critique of my ideology. Just shows that isn't room here for anarachist of any kind.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • Nematodes [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Y'all aren't critizing idoleogy y'all are just calling me a lib or an angry teenager...

          This comment once again has no real critique. Am I not allowed to complain?

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What anarchist books have you read that you thought were good

              Sarcastically: I'm a bit of an expert on anarchism you see. I once read a meme on r/complete@narchy back in the day

      • Nematodes [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can deal with post critizing anarchy. I'm just not seeing that. Alls I see are post calling anarchist fake. Or calling them libs. Or calling them angry teenagers.

        Soo what it sounds like is there isn't room for anarchist on lemmygrad? Are you willing to share with me some critiques of anarchism that are not based in literal name calling?

        Cuz I will read, but I'm not gonna stick around and get called a lib over and over again.

        • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          We are calling fake anarchists fake. No one said anarchists as a whole were fake. Why are you taking this personally. All the way from the title (self styled “anarchists”) it should’ve been clear it was criticizing a specific type of person laying false claim to the ideology of anarchism, not the whole.

          • Nematodes [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            OK but these are the only posts I see on here regarding anarchy. I see pretty Much "anarkiddys" And things like "anarchist just wanna be petty Bourgeoisie". Or memes just talking trash.

            (self styled “anarchists”) it should’ve been clear

            This alone doesn't convey that there are accept able forms of anarchy on this community. Its just bashing.

            • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No it doesn’t, I don’t know why you interpret it that way. Suggesting someone we don’t like has illegitimate claim to an ideology suggests someone we like has legitimate claim to it. Imagine Alex Jones says “these “conservatives” in the White House are evil,” it should be clear he likes conservatism but thinks neocons have an illegitimate claim to it.

              • Nematodes [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Suggesting someone we don’t like has illegitimate claim to an ideology suggests someone we like has legitimate claim to it.

                I guess... Although I'm a little confused.

                Imagine Alex Jones says “these “conservatives” in the white are evil,”

                But this is different than the OP. This clearly differentiates a sub group. The conservatives in white

                If I said these "conservatives" are full of shit. It kinda critizes the term "conservative" as well. And those who call themselves that.

                Once again, while I see your point. I still haven't seen a earnest critique of anarchy on this community. Maybe you can link one?

                  • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    One thing which always struck me from Marx's critiques of the Paris commune- that the various sections didn't come to the aid of eachother, and allowed the whole revolution to be defeated in detail. Some of the most cutting critiques anarchists have of AES states have been pretty much of exactly that mistake being repeated- it just played out on the scale of nations rather than within a city.

          • Nematodes [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I'm not responding to you to argue with you, I'm trying to help you have a less frustrating lemmy experience.

            I see. Thanks.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • Nematodes [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        My critique of this community is there no room for anarchist here of any kind.

        Which i stated above.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          deleted by creator

        • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          I'm fairly sure there are several well respected anarchists on Lemmygrad.

          You seem to be making a judgement based on one post, which you seem to have interpreted to mean something very different to what I thought it was saying. It comes off a little bit wrecker tbh, considering the 'anarchist' in the op is clearly qualified.

          If you did want an ML critique of anarchism, you could try: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Library:Anarchism_or_socialism%3F

    • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We’re calling libs who call themselves “anarchists” libs. Most of us have not condemned all anarchists.

    • Catradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you talking about when y'all openly bash anarchist? Calling them libs?

      every ideology will have a reactionary section that should be done away with, this is especially true for imperial core organizations