hmm, i think this is clearly in conversation with early dada. it's openness to interpretation and lack of any artistic form points in that direction, but the fact that it invites us to exercise thoughts about it makes me hesitant to label it truly dada. perhaps some kind pseudo-neo-dada?
hmm, i think this is clearly in conversation with early dada. it's openness to interpretation and lack of any artistic form points in that direction, but the fact that it invites us to exercise thoughts about it makes me hesitant to label it truly dada. perhaps some kind pseudo-neo-dada?
much to think about