• Adkml [he/him]
    hexbear
    41
    7 months ago

    I was going tonsay are we arguing this is a bad thing?

    This seems like a better use of money than 95% of America's budget.

    We're not actually against scientific research are we?

    • SchillMenaker [he/him]
      hexbear
      34
      7 months ago

      As someone with a science background I think that this is exactly the type of project that humanity should engage in. Major public works like housing, healthcare, and food for all are critical to the body of a socialist future, but these big ambitious scientific endeavors are critical to the soul of a socialist future.

      But, as someone with a making jokes background, this post is funny as shit and an A++ meme.

    • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
      hexbear
      15
      7 months ago

      If it were up to me hard sciences could only get funding if soft sciences thought they deserved it. I want physicists to have to woo anthropologists.

    • ComradeRat [he/him, they/them]
      hexbear
      4
      7 months ago

      Where are the raw materials (including energy!) for this project coming from? Are the miners in the global south or the indigenous peoples pushed off their lands not harmed by the constantly increasing demand for materials academics present? Will these people see any benefit, in their or their childrens' lifetimes? Do the bourgeois, the mining and metalworking companies and all their friends, not make massive amounts of money selling these materials? Are the carbon emissions and environmental destruction not worth preventing?

      • RyanGosling [none/use name]
        hexbear
        5
        7 months ago

        The people will die mining the materials, the materials will be sold for pennies to the west, and the west will create next generation bombs to kill the miners’ children. And you will pay for it. I fucking love science!!