On this day in 1884, the "Berlin Conference" began when delegations from nearly every Western European country and the U.S. met in Germany to develop a set of protocols for the seizure and control of African resources.

The conference, which had no African representatives, was the first international conference ever on the subject of Africa, and dealt almost soley with the matter of its exploitation.

At the time, approximately 80% of African land and resources were under domestic control; the influence of Europeans was most strongly exerted on the coast. Following it, colonial powers began seizing resources further inland.

As a result of the conference, which continued into 1885, a "General Act" was signed and ratified by all but one of the 14 nations at the table, the U.S. being the sole exception. The Act's main features were the establishment of a regime of free trade stretching across the middle of Africa, the development of which became the rationale for the recognition of the short-lived "Congo Free State", the abolition of the overland slave trade, and the principle of "effective occupation".

The Conference's rapacious intentions for Africa were noted by outsiders: socialist journalist Daniel De Leon described the conference as "an event unique in the history of political science...Diplomatic in form, it was economic in fact."

Before the Conference ended, the Lagos Observer declared that "the world had, perhaps, never witnessed a robbery on so large a scale." Theodore Holly, the first black Protestant Episcopal Bishop in the U.S., condemned the delegates as having "come together to enact into law, national rapine, robbery and murder".

Berlin 1884: Remembering the conference that divided Africa eu-cool

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]
    ·
    10 months ago
    Disclaimer: I am a cis male who is just spitballing. and believing the best in people

    I don't think the original was transphobic. I think the rewrite is.

    Maybe the wording "And your husband wants to be a girl" isn't great but I think the idea of wanting a drink and a place to talk, when your therapist is out of town, and your spouse comes out as trans, is more than fair. 8 words to convey such a complex set of thoughts and emotions is pretty impressive really. The lyrics of the chorus that follows that line are "You wanna go where people know, people are all the same" and the whole song is about wanting a sense of community and a safe space where people help each other work through their issues. More than most other situations I think that your husband "wanting to be a girl" would be a time where one would want a group of non judgemental familiar strangers and probably a drink.

    What is more likely, the change was made under pressure of the religious right or the studio was worried about the trans community in the 1980s?

    • kristina [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      While I can understand the idea, the previous verses were like "crazy world we live in" then this one is slipped in as an example. Learning about your SO being trans was equivocated with a pet dying

      I wouldn't say it's really catering to the right or not, it used to be common brain worms to make shitty jokes about queer people. I will say that Frasier has some fairly tasteful queer jokes for the era though