• SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Well what does that matter? Both parties are servile bootlickers of capital who think leftists should be removed from society, one party just thinks it should be done through executions

    The first thing I see when I look up Taibbi is some article where he's handwringing about people 'being unwilling to explore different points of view post Trump' (lmao), and Greggy G's twitter feed has his most recent tweet where he dumps on some journo for following the state department line vis a vis Israel (cool), and 2 tweets back from that where he seems to be going after a judge Lula appointed because a podcaster (who defended the existence of a Brazilian Nazi party, invited on stereotypical gamers, and generally seemed to be 'problematic') thought the judge was shit (absolutely not cool)

    Being 'non partisan' in this shithole hardly matters when both parties serve the same interests anyway.

    • davel [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      Being non-partisan isn’t a panacea to be sure. All it means is the potential to speak truth to power regardless of which party is in power, though it hardly guarantees it. And you’re right that, because he’s a liberal, his analysis is still going to be captured by liberal ideology. But his actual facts at least are generally fact-based.

      There are virtually no old-school investigative journalists/muckrakers who are actual leftists, so I have to take it where I can get it. Investigative journalism is slow & expensive, and corporate media 1) has become much more party-stratified over time, ever since cable news became a thing, and 2) they have mostly abandoned investigative journalism for budgetary reasons, because online ads don’t bring in much. Leftists have to run on shoestring budgets, so it’s no surprise that there isn’t much leftist investigative journalism to be found. All I can think of off the top of my head are Aaron Maté and Ben Norton, and I’m not sure to what extent they’d claim to be explicitly leftist.

      • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
        ·
        11 months ago

        That's somewhat fair, though I'd still steer clear of Greenwald or at least be highly critical of anything he throws out, he still tends to be a hack when it comes to leftists (going back to the Lula appointed judge thing).

        Leftists have to run on shoestring budgets, so it’s no surprise that there isn’t much leftist investigative journalism to be found

        Well yes, that and corporate media not wanting to give a platform to actual leftists for obvious reasons. You might have some luck with PSL published items like Liberation News, though as noted it's very rarely investigative journalism and mostly just analysis of existing conflict and articles.

        • davel [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I'd still steer clear of Greenwald

          He’s fallen off my map ever since he switched to his TV format; who has the time? He’s not really doing investigative reporting anymore.

          You might have some luck with PSL

          The bulk of what I read/hear/watch are leftist analyses. Fortunately there are many (several of which I pay)!