PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS [he/him, they/them] to news • 10 months agoNew Statement from Biden on the US-Mexico Borderimagemessage-square106 fedilinkarrow-up1177file-text
arrow-up1177imageNew Statement from Biden on the US-Mexico BorderPM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS [he/him, they/them] to news • 10 months agomessage-square106 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNephewAlphaBravo [he/him]hexbear21·10 months agoif you mean "why can't america as a whole do that" it's because we're run by a corporation wearing two trenchcoats link
minus-squarevoight [he/him, any]hexbear18·10 months ago @Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com In contrast to Germany, the U.S.A. had a constitution which was democratic from the start. And its ruling class managed, particularly during the imperialist era, to have the democratic forms so effectively preserved that by democratically legal means, it achieved a dictatorship of monopoly capitalism at least as firm as that which Hitler set up with tyrannic procedures. This smoothly functioning democracy, so-called, was created by the Presidential prerogative, the Supreme Court’s authority in constitutional questions, the finance monopoly over the Press, radio, etc., electioneering costs, which successfully prevented really democratic parties from springing up beside the two parties of monopoly capitalism, and lastly the use of terroristic devices (the lynching system). And this democracy could, in substance, realize everything sought by Hitler without needing to break with democracy formally. In addition, there was the incomparably broader and more solid economic basis of monopoly capitalism. link
if you mean "why can't america as a whole do that" it's because we're run by a corporation wearing two trenchcoats
@Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
In contrast to Germany, the U.S.A. had a constitution which was democratic from the start. And its ruling class managed, particularly during the imperialist era, to have the democratic forms so effectively preserved that by democratically legal means, it achieved a dictatorship of monopoly capitalism at least as firm as that which Hitler set up with tyrannic procedures. This smoothly functioning democracy, so-called, was created by the Presidential prerogative, the Supreme Court’s authority in constitutional questions, the finance monopoly over the Press, radio, etc., electioneering costs, which successfully prevented really democratic parties from springing up beside the two parties of monopoly capitalism, and lastly the use of terroristic devices (the lynching system). And this democracy could, in substance, realize everything sought by Hitler without needing to break with democracy formally. In addition, there was the incomparably broader and more solid economic basis of monopoly capitalism.