https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147931

Pressure on Biden worked?

What will it mean in reality?

  • Coolkidbozzy [he/him]
    ·
    3 months ago

    it will mean nothing, like the demand to end the US embargo of Cuba

      • Ecoleo [he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        What has the historical precedent been for countries that break a binding resolution?

        • zed_proclaimer [he/him]
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sanctions and then invasion if it’s an enemy of the USA. If not, then sternly worded letter

        • Awoo [she/her]
          ·
          3 months ago

          To my knowledge this has never happened to a country that has nuclear weapons.

          The resolutions have been enforced militarily in the past but only against countries without nuclear weapons. I sincerely doubt that would be the case for any nuclear armed country though. Libya is the obvious example.

          • YEP [he/him]
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even in the case of libya nato went well beyond the mandate of the security council resolution.

            • Awoo [she/her]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Oh absolutely but the point is that it simply wouldn't have happened at all if it were nuclear armed. It is a factor that completely changes the outcome of these council resolutions.

              Think DPRK as well. It genuinely doesn't matter what resolutions are made, the nukes change the result.

    • WWJD@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      3 months ago

      My first reaction as well but haven't seen the wordings. But one can hope. Secretary-General António Guterres said on X that the long-awaited resolution must be implemented; the Council’s failure to so “would be unforgivable.”