• ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    5 months ago

    if Clinton got to choose scotus justices instead of Trump, RvW would not have been overturned.

    Is that why she picked an anti abortion running mate in 2016? Because she cares about women?

    • BabyTurtles [none/use name]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Clinton absolutely doesn't care about people with wombs, all she cares about is herself, power, money, and a place in the history books, and I can't see any way in which overturning RvW would be her desired legacy. Nothing about it makes any sense.

      And just a gentle reminder that trans men can also be affected by this situation, so it's worth an effort to use trans inclusive language.