James Connolly, born on this day in 1868, was an Irish socialist revolutionary, founder of the Irish Citizen Army (ICA), and leader of the Easter Rising rebellion, for which he was executed by the British government.
Connolly was born in a poor Edinburgh neighborhood and spoke with a Scottish accent. He joined the British Army at age 14 to escape poverty and developed a hatred for the institution from firsthand experience. He deserted when his regiment was set to deploy to India.
He was also member of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) and founder of the Irish Socialist Republican Party. With labor radical James Larkin, he was centrally involved in the Dublin lock-out of 1913, after which the two men formed the Irish Citizen Army (ICA) the same year.
Connolly was opposed to British rule in Ireland and played a leading role in the Easter Rising of 1916, signing the "Proclamation of the Irish Republic" and serving as Commandant of the Dublin Brigade, the regiment that played the most substantial role in the Rising. Connolly was executed by firing squad following the Rising's defeat.
"If you remove the English army tomorrow and hoist the green flag over Dublin Castle, unless you set about the organization of the Socialist Republic your efforts would be in vain. England would still rule you. She would rule you through her capitalists, through her landlords, through her financiers, through the whole array of commercial and individualist institutions she has planted in this country and watered with the tears of our mothers and the blood of our martyrs."
James Connolly
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
Me brawling with my uni professor and it's so fucking funny. This man is willfully missing the point just so he can say China "is not as great as I think it is"
You condemn the violent suppression of peaceful protestors who don't want genocide, yet you excuse the violent suppression of a bunch of anticommunists who strung up and burned negotiators sent to talk to them? Curious!
Leaving aside christian-tinted moral questions about "good country or bad country" (as if such a framework isn't deeply embarrassing for someone who considers themselves a serious opinion holder), can you fucking imagine the military response if a bunch of leftists lynched some national guardsmen here? They would be sending death squads after everyone who's ever liked a "fuck cars" post. They would open fire with everything they had. They might very well airstrike the crowd like Argentina. It would be the real version of what the most deranged radlibs think happened on June 4, gutter hoses and all. The chuds would cheer, the libs would wring their hands and tut tut that if only we hadn't become so irrational and violent, maybe we could have voted in some real change, but now they're forced to support the fascists, because we just got too unruly.
Deeply unserious intellectual and moral cowards who refuse to game out the logical implications of their ideology, which they don't think they have.
"Terrible and probably biased": the liberalism is clinging on for dear life and won't let go.
I will not stop until he is praising Kim Jong Un and wishing for a unified socialist Korea.
Not to play Devil's Advocate, but it's fine to admit that China made a mistake about 40 years ago. Is he that bad of a lib that he thinks China would do it again right now so China is comparable to the US in terms of suppressing protests?
He believes that the US is a freer and more democratic country because he can say the president is a big dumb baby on x dot com and not get arrested. He is so lib but is willing to listen to everything I have to say since he likes me and I'm his student next academic semester.
I did say that no one should have died that day, but the bigger point was how the West completely erased all cultural and historical context to the point of absurdity so that no American could actually connect with their Chinese counterparts without this awkward "um aktually did u know u live under a totalitarian regime." I'm also still trying to deprogram all the Xinjiang lies so I'm using coverage about 6-4 in the West to demonstrate the willingness of MSM to distort the truth and face no consequences for doing so.
Wish all libs would let us cook like that guy. Godspeed.
Side point, is this a CS professor? I think I had a similar-ish prof but I cheesed his classes way too much to go and talk with him personally without feeling too bad.
He's a romance languages professor. I'm his best student afaik and i go to his office hours.
Go grab the UN final report on Xinjiang if you haven't already!
Can you be more specific? I'm only finding the one that claims there may be "serious human rights violations."
Nah, never show liberals weakness. If anything is going to work on them it is blindly asserting thr point with confidence.
Show him the pictures of pla soldiers who were crucified and burned alive and ask him when the last time 10% of the people killed during a protest in the west were police and soldiers.