Beetle_O_Rourke [none/use name] to chapotraphouse • 23 days agoAny Dermatologist not in bed with Big Soap will agree!!imagemessage-square51 fedilinkarrow-up178file-text
arrow-up178imageAny Dermatologist not in bed with Big Soap will agree!!Beetle_O_Rourke [none/use name] to chapotraphouse • 23 days agomessage-square51 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepooh [she/her, any]hexbear16·23 days agoI think the Romans also attempted this with the British, from what I've read. link
minus-squaresir_this_is_a_wendys [he/him]hexbear13·23 days agoI really do wonder if that isle is possibly literally cursed link
minus-squareTankiedesantski [he/him]hexbear12·23 days agoAnd neither Romans nor Vikings are around anymore. Coincidence? I think not! link
minus-squarepooh [she/her, any]hexbear6·23 days agoWell, I mean, the modern English are sort of descended from Vikings (Anglo-Saxons). Scots and Irish are still mostly Celtic though (I think) and those places are way cooler, so not sure this argument holds link
minus-squarepseudo@jlai.luhexbear5·23 days agoNot an expert but from the name, I would imagine they descend from the Angles (Engles?) and the Saxes not from the Vikings. linkfedilink
minus-squarepooh [she/her, any]hexbear4·22 days agoYeah, for some reason I was thinking Angles and Saxons were considered Vikings but I was totally wrong on that. You are correct. link
minus-squareProfessorOwl_PhD [any]hexbear2·21 days agoNortheast England and the east coast of Scotland have a fair amount of viking ancestry about from all the raiding, so it's not completely baseless. link
minus-squareTankiedesantski [he/him]hexbear4·23 days agoDescended from is not the same as being. An Italian American is not an Italian is not a Roman even if you can trace descent. link
I think the Romans also attempted this with the British, from what I've read.
I really do wonder if that isle is possibly literally cursed
And neither Romans nor Vikings are around anymore. Coincidence? I think not!
Well, I mean, the modern English are sort of descended from Vikings (Anglo-Saxons). Scots and Irish are still mostly Celtic though (I think) and those places are way cooler, so not sure this argument holds
Not an expert but from the name, I would imagine they descend from the Angles (Engles?) and the Saxes not from the Vikings.
Yeah, for some reason I was thinking Angles and Saxons were considered Vikings but I was totally wrong on that. You are correct.
Northeast England and the east coast of Scotland have a fair amount of viking ancestry about from all the raiding, so it's not completely baseless.
Descended from is not the same as being. An Italian American is not an Italian is not a Roman even if you can trace descent.
deleted by creator