Abomination Vaults has a mimic encounter where one is pretending to be a door and the other is pretending to be a weapon rack with a nice axe on it. Gets them either way.

You might also want to look into Rotgrind's Mimouthouse. It's exactly what it sounds like.

Yeah, that happens when you have a Germanic base slathered with french and Latin vocabulary and sprinkled with loanwords from nearly every continent.

Vibes based language.

I have just learnt you can stop the beam without killing the eximus. Can't help you on tracking speed, I find as long as you keep moving they don't catch up.

It's the gen1 games except you can fuse any two pokemon to make cronenburgian nightmares. I don't know if there are any actual advantages to fusion, it just seems to make everything look worse and give them stupid names.

When I was in Scotland I had a piece of deep fried mars bar once. It tasted like heart failure.

It's a decentralised FOSS reddit alternative built by and for communists. Your "lobby" is lemm.ee, because that's the instance you joined. If you want to see different communities you'll need to join a different instance with different federation.

Depends entirely on where in Europe you're going - There are technically more countries where you'll be able to use German, but it's often limited to specific areas of them that are right next to Germany, so neither language is super useful for Europe in general.
You'll have better results working on your feelings of being a dipshit who only knows one language - even if you learn a new one you aren't going to be speaking the local language for a lot of the trip, but the locals will probably speak some English, so you'll be doing a lot of communication with a mix of that and a translator app. Plenty of locals won't speak any English though, or any other foreign languages, because like you they don't have a need for a second language; neither you nor they are dipshits for not knowing how something you have never needed or used works.

Nintendo announced a surprise comeback for the series by turning a CEO into a real ghost.

Dirty is an extreme outlier and should not be assumed to be representative of the average owl.

Gods, how did I forget Lambrini girls? Company Culture goes so fucking hard.

I mean you might get an exemption by disabling DMs, but even low risk carries a lot of requirements that aren't going to be cheap or easy to maintain.

It also doesn't apply

Doesn't initially apply. You are buying yourself a few months at most.

Some UK stuff worth a try: Idles
Kid Kapichi
Bob Vylan

I'm not saying the guidance is good or sensible, I'm saying that you currently have the same options as LFGSS - spend an inordinate amount of money verifying users or shut down. It explicitly calls out your solution as unacceptable, regardless of your feelings. Yes, the methods are unreasonable, yes the government wants complete control over the internet, no it's not going to make a difference when you cop your £18 mil fine. Welcome to the UK, it fucking sucks, get used to it.

You need to actually read the guidance, an "I am 18" checkbox isn't going to cut it.

Stage 1: Is it possible for children to access the service or part of it? Under the Online Safety Act, ‘children’ means anyone under 18.

You can only conclude that it is not possible for children to access your service if you are using age verification or age estimation (together known as age assurance), which prevents children from normally being able to access that service.

[...]

Examples of age assurance methods that have the potential to meet the above criteria include:

photo-ID matching
facial age estimation
reusable digital identity services.

Examples of age assurance methods that are not highly effective include:

payment methods which do not require the user to be over 18
your terms and conditions say the service is for over 18s only

Even then, most of the afternoon would just be looking up the Korean translation of "remote-controlled plane".

It really doesn't take that much browsing to find out that we attack all of those people constantly. It's like our second favourite thing after dunking on libs.

No, I'm using the same toothless definition you're using - publicly supporting a political stance. Or are you saying she never fought for minorities in any sense?

So does she have to fight or not? Moving the battleground to individuals doesn't mean it's not a fight - either she's stopped, or she's still fighting. It sounds to me that you're not actually considering what you've already said, and are just grasping for any argument that will help you "win" in the moment.