• Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    They're afraid of the spectre of communism.

    It's like that marching at the beginning of Hell March 2, quietly getting louder and louder, for years and years. Then the guitar riff kicks in and suddenly communism's back baby. Right now they can hear the marching, it's quiet and in the distance... but they are afraid.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      11 days ago

      Indeed, now that they're no longer able to prevent trade with DPRK and Cuba, they're going to develop rapidly and all the propaganda about communism stifling development is going to fall apart. Everyone will see that it was US blockade on these countries that was preventing them from developing.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        11 days ago

        I hope that's the case, the very first thing they need to look at is increasing the country's power production capacity so that stable electricity can be supplied everywhere all at once instead of just Pyongyang. Hitting that milestone will result in a considerable amount of progress as the population will be able to do a lot more with less, people will have less chores due to the electrification and appliances that shorten time spent on such tasks which will open up people's time to doing more, both leisure and productive work in their spare time.

        That and much more modern heavy machinery for many of the agricultural tasks the country has.

        Robotics for factories would be a huge boon because they could reduce factory workforces enormously and push that labour towards other tasks.

        • Droplet [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Machinery for agriculture is not an issue for the DPRK.

          In fact, the DPRK had one of the most mechanized agricultural sectors in the world, which actually created a lot of issues during the 1990s when the USSR collapsed and fuel supply to the DPRK stopped, rendering the farming equipments unusable. Together with an exceedingly high urbanization rate (70% of its people lived in urban area, sustained by highly mechanized farming in the rural area), and unprecedented weather disasters (freeze, floods, drought all happening in the period between 1994-96), what followed was famine and many of the subsistence farming practice that resulted also depleted what little left of their arable land, and vast areas of woods chopped down for heating during the famine period caused soil erosion that exacerbated floods and various ecological problems. North Korea’s problem is more ecological than technological at this point.

          Given the exceedingly hostile climate of Northeast Asia, the DPRK has to choose whether to rely on food import (which was exactly the route South Korea took and focused solely on manufacturing and technology sectors) but this would directly oppose their Juche ideology, or spend a disproportionate amount of the economy to squeeze out agricultural output. As a comparison, South Korea never spent more than 2% of their GDP on agriculture, whereas the DPRK has consistently spent ~20% of the GDP on agriculture every year.

          • TheWurstman [he/him]
            ·
            10 days ago

            https://monthlyreview.org/2024/03/01/industrial-agriculture-lessons-from-north-korea/

            What North Korea does with agriculture is insanely impressive considering they use almost no fossil fuels the west could literally try learn a thing or two