Helmeted demonstrators on a grassy bank, armed with flagpoles, c. 1970s. Photo credit Takashi Hamaguchi

On this day in 1966, the Japanese government announced the construction of an airport on farmland in rural Sanrizuka, without permission of displaced locals. The struggle was led by the Sanrizuka-Shibayama United Opposition League against Construction of the Narita Airport, which locals formed under the leadership of opposition parties the Communist Party and Socialist Party. The struggle resulted in significant delays in the opening of the airport, as well as deaths on both sides.

At its height, the union mobilised 17,500 people for a general rally, while thousands of riot police were brought in on several occasions.

The area around Sanrizuka had been farmland since the Middle Ages, and, prior to the 1940s, much of the land had been privately owned by the Japanese Imperial Household.

Many locals were economically reliant on the Imperial estate at Goryō Farm, and local farmers had a strong economic and emotional attachment to the land. After Japan's defeat in World War II, large tracts of royal land were sold off and subsequently settled by poor rural laborers.

In the 1960s, the Japanese government planned to build a second airport in the Tokyo area to support Japan's rapid economic development. After meeting resistance from locals on the site's first chosen location, the rural town of Tomisato, the government was donated remaining land in Sanrizuka by the Imperial Family.

Locals in Sanrizuka were outraged when the government announced its plans. The Sanrizuka-Shibayama United Opposition League Against the Construction of Narita Airport (or Hantai Dōmei) was formed in 1966, and began to engage in a variety of tactics of resistance, including legal buy-ups, sit-ins, and occupations.

Meanwhile, the Japanese radical student movement was growing, and the League soon formed an alliance with active New Left groups; one major factor drawing the groups the together was that, under the US-Japan Security Treaty, the US military had free access to Japanese air facilities. As a result, it was likely the airport would be used for transporting troops and arms in the Vietnam War.

The demonstrators built huts and watchtowers along proposed construction sites. On October 10th, 1967, the government attempted to conduct a land survey, backed by over 2000 riot police. Clashes quickly broke out, and Hantai Domei leader Issaku Tomura was photographed being brutalized by police, further inflaming anti-airport sentiment.

Protests further grew and intensified over the next few years as the state pressed on with attempts to build the airport. Protestors would dig into the ground, build fortifications, and arm themselves against police. Construction was delayed by years, and the conflict would cost the government billions of yen.

On September 16th, 1971, three police officers were killed during an eminent domain expropriation. Four days later, police forcibly removed and destroyed the house of an elderly woman, an incident that became yet another symbol of state oppression to the opposition.

One student committed suicide, saying in his suicide note that "I detest those who brought the airport to this land". In 1972, the protestors built a 60 meter-high steel tower near the runway in order to disrupt flight tests. Conflict continued through much of the 1970s.

In 1977, the government announced plans to open the airport within the year. In May, police destroyed the tower while demonstrators attempted to cling on to it, provoking a new wave of widespread conflict. One protestor was killed after being struck in the head by a tear gas canister. In March 1978, the first runway was set to open, but a few days prior, a group of saboteurs burrowed into the main control tower, barricaded themselves inside, and proceeded to lay waste to the tower's equipment and infrastructure, delaying the opening yet again to May 20th, 1978.

Resistance continued after the airport was opened. Although many locals began to accept the airport and leave the land, the focus of Hantai Dōmei shifted to opposing plans for additional terminals and runways, as the airport's current size still only reflected a fraction of initial plans.

Clashes continued through the 1980s - on October 20th, 1985, members of the communist New Left group Chukaku-ha broke though police lines with logs and flagpoles, successfully attacking infrastructure in one of the last large-scale battles of the resistance campaign. Guerilla actions and bombings continued as late as the 1990s.

Although this campaign of resistance has largely shifted out of public attention in Japan, its presence is still felt: until 2015, all visitors were required to present ID cards for security reasons, and the airport still remains only a third of its initially-planned size. The Sanrizuka Struggle has never completely ended, and the Opposition League still exists and holds rallies.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • HarryLime [any]
    ·
    10 days ago

    Imagining Alexander Mercouris doing a video on the Kendrick-Drake beef.

    "And Kendrick did not merely call Drake a pedophile once, he called him a pedophile over and over again, over the course of multiple songs. I have to say that there are several things that must be kept in mind. Kendrick Lamar is not merely a rapper, he is a published poet and a winner of the Pulitzer prize, which should give you an idea how skilled, how verbally dexterous he is in comparison to Drake. Drake does not have the level of skill to properly match this level of verbal assault, and, well, that's how this rap beef ends in a clear victory for Lamar. I do feel, however, that we should be careful in decrying Drake as a pedophile merely over these songs. There has been some proverbial smoke, as we all know, but there have never been any actual allegations of Drake being a pedophile. Millie Bobbie Brown has defended Drake, and no one has ever alleged that they were a victim of Drake. Kendrick being the superior rapper does not, by itself, indicate that Drake is an actual pedophile, even if Kendrick did win the proverbial beef."

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      10 days ago

      CW: discussion of pedophilia.

      spoiler

      This sounds reasonable to me. pedojacketing has become common to the point of absurdity, with casual accusations that some random politico or public figure is a pedophile over completely inane shit. Meanwhile, for all practical intents and purposes, the actual perpetrators of sexual violence against children are still dads, coaches, and church group leaders just like they always have been. I really seriously think that the way accusations of pedophilia are lobbed around so casually is harmful because it serves to continually reinforce the idea that pedophiles are primarily strangers and obscure the reality that they're almost always men who are close to the victim and have power over the victim, as mentioned almost always an older male relative, church leader, sports coach, or equivalent.

      But yeah other than that Drake should cut his hair and go live in a cave or something there's really no coming back from this.

      • HarryLime [any]
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah, I think there's an abundance of evidence that Drake is probably a horrible person. But I'm not going to believe the pedophile accusations just because Kendrick rhymes about it really well.