The Congo Civil War, or Congo Crisis, was a complex political tumult that began just days following Belgium’s granting of Congolese independence in 1960. Lasting four years, the associated violence claimed an estimated 100,000 lives including the nation’s first Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, and UN Secretary Dag Hammarskjöld, who was killed in a plane crash as he attempted to mediate the crisis. Escalating with the secession of the southernmost province of Katanga, the conflict concluded five years later with a united Congo emerging under the dictatorship of Joseph-Désiré Mobutu.

On June 30, 1960, Belgium negotiated post-colonial mining rights in declaring an independent Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Yet within days, soldiers of the Congolese army mutinied, demanding increased pay and the removal of white officers from their ranks. When Belgium intervened militarily, more soldiers rebelled. Many of these soldiers gravitated toward the radical nationalist Prime Minister Patrice Emery Lumumba.

Then, dominated by Belgian business interests, the mineral-rich Katanga province under the leadership of Moïse Kapenda Tshombe seceded from the DRC with Belgian support. Congolese President Joseph Kasavubu and Prime Minister Lumumba asked and received a peacekeeping force from the United Nations (UN).

The conflict also became the site of a dangerous Cold War “proxy” contest between western powers led by the United States and the Soviet Union-led Communist bloc. Under pressure from western nations and in exchange for UN support, President Kasavubu purged his government of radical elements including Prime Minister Lumumba. The ultra-nationalist Lumumba, though supported by the Congolese, was viewed by Western business leaders as an obstacle to their continued investments in Congolese diamond mines. Fearing Lumumba was secretly a Communist, the United States was particularly adamant about his removal from power.

Lumumba responded by firing Kasavubu as both leaders claimed control over the country, and Army Chief of Staff Joseph Mobutu in turn orchestrated a military coup d’état which ousted the two leaders. Mobutu’s government was supported by western governments. The Soviet Union and other Communist nations supported Lumumba who ultimately was killed by Katangan rebels.

With his chief rival removed, Mobutu pledged nominal support to President Kasavubu and the two led the successful effort to end the Katanga secession. UN forces eventually recaptured all of Katanga province. In 1964, a new rebellion began in the Eastern Congo when armed fighters (“Simbas”) began to spread across the region. Ironically, Moïse Tshombe, who had led the secessionist Katanga province, was made prime minister with the mandate to defeat these rebels and end other regional revolts. The Simbas were defeated in November 1964.

One year later, Mobutu seized power from President Kasavubu after having persuaded Western leaders that he was the most effective leader in the fight against communism. Kasavubu and Tshombe were exiled as Mobutu set up a one-party dictatorship, controlling the nation until 1997. Nonetheless, for the first time since independence, all of the country was ruled by one government.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • The_sleepy_woke_dialectic [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just because we say "I understand Putin's motives and here's why it's ultimately NATO's fault this happened" doesn't mean every last one of us wouldn't write that class traitor's name in a death note given the chance.

    • Tomboymoder [she/her]
      ·
      3 days ago

      It's both US Nato AND Russia's fault, you buffoons. They both orchestrated this path for Ukraine.

      • hello_hello [they/them, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This is just "Neither Washington nor Moscow/Beijing" again. The West is far more culpable in the destruction of Ukraine than any Russian politician ever since its actions in Former Yugoslavia all the way back in the 90s post soviet era (also brought by the West). It is the West who asks for the war to go on "to the last Ukrainian" while Russia drafts peace proposals that get summarily rejected. It is the West who create a so-called "peace summit" where they didn't even bother to invite the other side in the conflict so it's not actually a peace summit but a war summit.

        Critical Support for the Russia's SMO because it's the only side in this conflict that wants to sue for peace while Ukrainian Nazis kidnap middle aged men and young boys to send them to the meat grinder. In an entirely unsurprising turn of events, Russia (and therefore by extension Putin) ending the war would actually be the more beneficial option to the Ukrainian proletariat than whatever the Kyiv regime is planning with their Washington handlers.

        But yeah peppino-shotgun russia-cool on any domestic social issues and their neoliberal hell of a society. (That's right this site has a <russia-cool> emoji, so I don't know what you mean by putinists)

        In a gross oversimplification, Putin is just a neoliberal ghoul who was pushed left by even more crass and cruel West who didn't accept him into their clique