It's almost like people are trained to accept capitalist slavery as normal and hate poor people.
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/034e301d-a35e-48e0-b2e8-55c443d7df52.jpeg)
By the way, many widows and children were sent to workhouses. Unable to support themselves after the man of the house died from war or tuberculosis or some shit.
Gee, I wonder why women fought so hard for the right to enter the male workforce and vote.
The New Poor Law of 1834 attempted to reverse the economic trend by discouraging the provision of relief to anyone who refused to enter a workhouse. Some Poor Law authorities hoped to run workhouses at a profit by utilising the free labour of their inmates. Most were employed on tasks such as breaking stones, crushing bones to produce fertiliser, or picking oakum using a large metal nail known as a spike.
>Hush-a-bye baby, on the tree top,
When you grow old, your wages will stop,
When you have spent the little you made
First to the Poorhouse and then to the grave
The Poor Law was not designed to address the issue of poverty, which was considered to be the inevitable lot for most people; rather it was concerned with pauperism, "the inability of an individual to support himself". Writing in 1806 Patrick Colquhoun commented that:
"Poverty ... is a most necessary and indispensable ingredient in society, without which nations and communities could not exist in a state of civilisation. It is the lot of man – it is the source of wealth, since without poverty there would be no labour, and without labour there could be no riches, no refinement, no comfort, and no benefit to those who may be possessed of wealth."
Monstrous.
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/6a3328a9-e937-4cbe-8b12-9340acacd77b.jpeg)
This all happened under capitalism.
And the kicker?
US prisons use slave labour even today.
There are over a million slaves today in these US prisons.
And even Western countries today that provide relief to the poor operate on the same principal of Less Eligibility as the British capitalists did in the 18 and 1900s.
Make no mistake, the ruling class know where their wealth comes from and will leech you dry, one way or another.
And the kicker here is that at the time, these same liberals were patting themselves on the back for supposedly abolishing slavery.
Much like the how the British pat themselves on the back for fighting the Nazis while doing the same Nazi trick of dehumanising the less fortunate.
Praise themselves for fighting the Nazis while starving 3 million Indians to death
And the "abolishment" was paying restitution to the slave owners instead of throwing them off of a cliff
Yep. The liberal obsession with respecting property rights. Even Abraham Lincoln wanted to do this but, thankfully the slave owners in the border states were too stupid to take the payout.
Abolishing slavery, while also continuing the buy unfathomable amounts of cotton from US slave plantations for the UK textile industry.
And they kept growing sugar in the Caribbean using
slavesindentured servants from India.