Explain the bookclub: We are reading Volumes 1, 2, and 3 in one year and discussing it in weekly threads. (Volume IV, often published under the title Theories of Surplus Value, will not be included in this particular reading club, but comrades are encouraged to do other solo and collaborative reading.) This bookclub will repeat yearly. The three volumes in a year works out to about 6½ pages a day for a year, 46⅔ pages a week.

I'll post the readings at the start of each week and @mention anybody interested. Let me know if you want to be added or removed.


Just joining us? You can use the archives below to help you reading up to where the group is. There is another reading group on a different schedule at https://lemmygrad.ml/c/genzhou (federated at !genzhou@lemmygrad.ml ) which may fit your schedule better. The idea is for the bookclub to repeat annually, so there's always next year.

Archives: Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16Week 17Week 18Week 19Week 20Week 21Week 22Week 23Week 24Week 25Week 26 – Week 27


Week 28, July 8-14. From Volume 2, we are reading Parts 10-13 of Chapter 20, Simple Reproduction.


https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1885-c2/index.htm


Discuss the week's reading in the comments.


  • Beaver [he/him]
    ·
    4 months ago

    Foreign trade is just adding an extension onto the circuit, like adding an extra extension onto a raceway. It changes the dynamics, but not the fundamentals - capital is still racing around the racetrack (in this tortured analogy). Capitalism today is much more globalized; foreign trade is the norm on a lot of basic goods. And yet, we see all the same contradictions and failures of Marx's time, where much more economic activity stayed circulating within a region.

    I was going to say something about how it's all a closed system, but that's not really accurate (this is the chapter on reproduction, after all).

    • Kolibri [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That's a good point, I neglected to connected it back to the circuit.