It's not just California, but it's crazy how much ammo the libs give fash (or even just fash energies within the completely apolitical) by steadfastly refusing to supply housing to homeless people.
Like they could enjoy a 1000-year reich if they would just build some dignified housing, but they're constitutionally unable to do the one simple (and not even that expensive) task that will actually address homelessness.
in a state where every working class person is paying 50% of their income for a roof over their heads, hearing the democrats are giving free housing to """the undeserving poor""" may not be so popular. or maybe it would, idk anymore.
It's not just California, but it's crazy how much ammo the libs give fash (or even just fash energies within the completely apolitical) by steadfastly refusing to supply housing to homeless people.
Like they could enjoy a 1000-year reich if they would just build some dignified housing, but they're constitutionally unable to do the one simple (and not even that expensive) task that will actually address homelessness.
in a state where every working class person is paying 50% of their income for a roof over their heads, hearing the democrats are giving free housing to """the undeserving poor""" may not be so popular. or maybe it would, idk anymore.
The politicians themselves are landleeches and speculators
That's true, but homeless encampments are bad for property values