The Great Pueblo Revolt, or Pueblo Revolt (1680–1696), was a 16-year period in the history of the American southwest when the Pueblo people overthrew the Spanish conquistadors and began to rebuild their communities. The events of that period have been viewed over the years as a failed attempt to permanently expel Europeans from the pueblos, a temporary setback to Spanish colonization, a glorious moment of independence for the Pueblo people of the American southwest, or part of a larger movement to purge the Pueblo world of foreign influence and return to traditional ways of life. It was no doubt a bit of all four.

The Spanish first entered the northern Rio Grande region in 1539 and its control was cemented in place by the 1599 siege of Acoma pueblo by Don Vicente de Zaldivar and a few score of soldier colonists from the expedition of Don Juan de Oñate. At Acoma's Sky City, Oñate's forces killed 800 people and captured 500 women and children and 80 men. After a "trial," everyone over the age of 12 was enslaved; all men over 25 had a foot amputated. Roughly 80 years later, a combination of religious persecution and economic oppression led to a violent uprising in Santa Fe and other communities of what is today northern New Mexico. It was one of the few successful—if temporary—forceful stoppages of the Spanish colonial juggernaut in the New World.

Life Under the Spanish

As they had done in other parts of the Americas, the Spanish installed a combination of military and ecclesiastical leadership in New Mexico. The Spanish established missions of Franciscan friars in several pueblos to specifically break up the Indigenous religious and secular communities, stamp out religious practices and replace them with Christianity. Active efforts to convert the Pueblo people to Christianity involved destroying kivas and other structures, burning ceremonial paraphernalia in public plazas, and using accusations of witchcraft to imprison and execute traditional ceremonial leaders.

The government also established an encomienda system, allowing up to 35 leading Spanish colonists to collect tribute from the households of a particular pueblo. Hopi oral histories report that the reality of the Spanish rule included forced labor, the seduction of Hopi women, raiding of kivas and sacred ceremonies, harsh punishment for failing to attend mass, and several rounds of drought and famine.

Growing Unrest

While the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 was the event that (temporarily) removed the Spanish from the southwest, it was not the first attempt. The Pueblo people had offered resistance throughout the 80-year period following the conquest. Public conversions didn't (always) lead to people giving up their traditions but rather drove the ceremonies underground. The Jemez (1623), Zuni (1639) and Taos (1639) communities each separately (and unsuccessfully) revolted. There also were multi-village revolts that took place in the 1650s and 1660s, but in each case, the planned revolts were discovered and the leaders executed.

The Pueblos were independent societies before Spanish rule, and fiercely so. What led to the successful revolt was the ability to overcome that independence and coalesce. Some scholars think it was a millenarian movement, and have pointed to a population collapse in the 1670s resulting from a devastating epidemic that killed off an estimated 80% of the Indigenous population, and it became clear that the Spanish were unable to explain or prevent epidemic diseases or calamitous droughts. In some respects, the battle was one of whose god was on whose side: both Pueblo and Spanish sides identified the mythical character of certain events, and both sides believed the events involved supernatural intervention.

Nonetheless, the suppression of Indigenous practices became particularly intense between 1660 and 1680, and one of the main reasons for the successful revolt appears to have occurred in 1675 when then-governor Juan Francisco de Trevino arrested 47 "sorcerers," one of whom was Po'pay of San Juan Pueblo.

Leadership

Po'Pay (or Popé) was a Tewa religious leader, and he was to become a key leader and perhaps primary organizer of the rebellion. Po'Pay may have been key, but there were plenty of other leaders in the rebellion. Domingo Naranjo, a man of African and Indigeneous heritage, is often cited, and so are El Saca and El Chato of Taos, El Taque of San Juan, Francisco Tanjete of San Ildefonso, and Alonzo Catiti of Santo Domingo.

Under the rule of colonial New Mexico, the Spanish deployed ethnic categories ascribing "Pueblo" to lump linguistically and culturally diverse people into a single group, establishing dual and asymmetric social and economic relationships between the Spanish and Pueblo people. Po'pay and the other leaders appropriated this to mobilize the disparate and decimated villages against their colonizers.

August 10–19, 1680

After eight decades of living under foreign rule, Pueblo leaders fashioned a military alliance that transcended longstanding rivalries. For nine days, together they besieged the capital of Santa Fe and other pueblos. In this initial battle, over 400 Spanish military personnel and colonists and 21 Franciscan missionaries lost their lives: the number of Pueblo people who died is unknown. Governor Antonio de Otermin and his remaining colonists retreated in ignominy to El Paso del Norte (what is today Cuidad Juarez in Mexico).

Witnesses said that during the revolt and afterward, Po'Pay toured the pueblos, preaching a message of nativism and revivalism. He ordered the Pueblo people to break up and burn the images of Christ, the Virgin Mary, and other saints, to burn the temples, smash the bells, and separate from the wives the Christian church had given them.

Revitalization and Reconstruction

Between 1680 and 1692, despite the efforts of the Spanish to recapture the region, the Pueblo people rebuilt their kivas, revived their ceremonies and reconsecrated their shrines. People left their mission pueblos at Cochiti, Santo Domingo and Jemez and built new villages, such as Patokwa (established in 1860 and made up of Jemez, Apache/Navajos and Santo Domingo pueblo people), Kotyiti (1681, Cochiti, San Felipe and San Marcos pueblos), Boletsakwa (1680–1683, Jemez and Santo Domingo), Cerro Colorado (1689, Zia, Santa Ana, Santo Domingo) There were many others.

The architecture and settlement planning at these new villages was a new compact, dual-plaza form, a departure from the scattered layouts of mission villages. Liebmann and Pruecel have argued that this new format is what the builders considered a "traditional" village, based on clan moieties. Some potters worked on reviving traditional motifs on their glaze-ware ceramics, such as the doubled-headed key motif, which originated fro, 1400–1450.

New social identities were created, blurring the traditional linguistic-ethnic boundaries that defined Pueblo villages during the first eight decades of colonization. Inter-Pueblo trade and other ties between Pueblo people were established, such as new trade relationships between Jemez and Tewa people which became stronger during the revolt era than they had been in the 300 years before 1680.

Reconquest Attempts by the Spanish to reconquer the Rio Grande region began as early as 1681 when the former governor Otermin attempted to take back Santa Fe. Others included Pedro Romeros de Posada in 1688 and Domingo Jironza Petris de Cruzate in 1689—Cruzate's reconquest was particularly bloody, his group destroyed Zia pueblo, killing hundreds of residents. But the uneasy coalition of independent pueblos wasn't perfect: without a common enemy, the confederation broke into two factions: the Keres, Jemez, Taos and Pecos against the Tewa, Tanos, and Picuris.

The Spanish capitalized on the discord to make several reconquest attempts, and in August of 1692, the new governor of New Mexico Diego de Vargas, initiated his own reconquest, and this time was able to reach Santa Fe and on August 14 proclaimed the "Bloodless Reconquest of New Mexico." A second abortive revolt occurred in 1696, but after it failed, the Spanish remained in power until 1821 when Mexico declared independence from Spain.

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo

The Tribal community known as "Tigua" established Ysleta del Sur in 1682. After leaving the homelands of Quarai Pueblo due to drought, the Tigua sought refuge at Isleta Pueblo and were later captured by the Spanish during the 1680 Pueblo Revolt and forced to walk south for over 400 miles. The Tigua settled and built the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and, soon after, the acequia (canal) system that sustained a thriving agricultural-based community.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE PUEBLO REVOLT

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • WhyEssEff [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    not only is trying to reclaim ‘ZOG’ entirely destructive towards any optics and fundamentally uncomfortable but it’s also completely stale and unilluminating at this point within the circles said discourse is happening in. the US government has a vested interest in the maintenance of Israel. first month-type discourse. edge for the sake of edge. it’s literally just wearing a giant shirt that says “I love making people uncomfortable” and smirking at the people who take heed and dip like what’s even the point here

    • HarryLime [any]
      ·
      1 month ago

      It's ultimately anti-illuminating because the term "occupied" implies that the governing structure would otherwise be good if not for the Zionists that occupy it. It may be literally true that the government is occupied by Zionists, but the larger implication of the term is that there is a core of purity in society that is otherwise corrupted by an alien, outside force, which is a foundational premise of reactionary thought.

      The thing is, I'm seeing people in this discourse say that after months of witnessing videos of innocent people and children being turned into pulp that they just don't care about what terms they use anymore, and I can honestly totally understand that. This illustrates the obvious danger of accusations of antisemitism being used so relentlessly and cynically against any criticism of Israel- people are just going to stop caring about it. Which of course only serves Israeli interests further. It's so bleak.

      • WhyEssEff [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Israel is going to go down killing and maiming as the hitlerian project of a new generation and it also may actually rebirth legitimate antisemitic sentiment on the way down with it. loathe the Zionist entity with all my fucking being. a fundamental cancer on a nigh-century of Judaism and completely anathema to its projected purpose of existence doomjak

        • HarryLime [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I hope I didn't imply that there's any such thing as antisemitic sentiment that's "legitimate," because there isn't. But like, yeah, antisemitism is going to spread and accusations of antisemitism are going to lose their potency because of all this. Like, a literal, factual description of Israeli actions and the things the Israeli military does and the things that Israeli society as a whole have enthusiastically countenanced sound like the most deranged antisemitic fantasies you can come up with. It's going to be harder to fight against antisemitism because of what Israel has done and what Israel is. I don't know what else to say other than it's bleak and horrifying, but it is.

          • WhyEssEff [she/her]
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nah I’m basically differentiating between the Israel lobby definition and normal definition, all good

        • hello_hello [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          the hitlerian project of a new generation

          In the school I went to the teacher basically book-ended the holocaust history lesson by saying that because of it Jews now have the state of Israel and they are not oppressed anymore and to be against the state of Israel is holocaust denial because you don't believe that Jews deserve a place to live.

          It is not looking good for Jews who live in pro-Israel nations marx-doomer

      • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]
        ·
        1 month ago

        I totally agree. zionists aren't occupying the government of usa. Its like saying Apples are occupying the branches on an apple tree. They are different aspects of the same euro/white-supremacist colonialism monster.

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]
      ·
      1 month ago

      if you need to reclaim ZOG for literally any discourse reason you are talking to someone who has been in a coma since October 8th. you are not breaking new ground. you are not advancing the framework. you are throwing a Molotov cocktail at your feet and going “ahh, fascinating how people refuse to stand next to me right now”

      • WhyEssEff [she/her]
        ·
        1 month ago

        x dot com the everything app the place where chan lingo is the Overton window

        • WhyEssEff [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          feels fundamentally sickening to me being a tone police gal but I’m just like, what are we doing here. why. for what purpose. is it worth it