The kicker:

The system isn’t purely run on AI. It also relies on human input to help it learn and become more accurate.

And then

And so far it’s getting high marks from employees

(no employees interviewed or cited)

Who call it “Bo-Linda”

Love to regurgitate company PR material as fact

  • kleeon [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It makes me irrationally mad that machine learning has been renamed to "AI" through deliberate misuse

      • kleeon [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        3 months ago

        Was it? Maybe in western parlance it was, but I think that's completely inaccurate and is being pushed by companies to market their products

        Like, why would you call decision trees or linear regression "Intelligent"? I feel like we're just watering down what intelligence means at this point

        • m532 [she/her]
          ·
          3 months ago

          The bourgies want to devalue humans with this. Equal the humans to machines to bring more slavery.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            3 months ago

            I'm still disgusted by computer touchers using "meat" prefixes to denigrate human beings and make the computers they touch seem somehow more uplifted.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          3 months ago

          Like, why would you call decision trees or linear regression "Intelligent"? I feel like we're just watering down what intelligence means at this point

          It's crude reductionism in the form of "if you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail" thinking.

    • Hexboare [they/them]
      ·
      3 months ago

      that machine learning has been renamed to "AI"

      Well that's what happens when you call statistics machine learning

      The machine ain't learning shit

    • Cammy [she/her]
      ·
      3 months ago

      I feel like we shouldn't be surprised given the inaccurate mainstreaming of therapy jargon.