The fun part is that it is absolutely legal and constitutional to do so. Generally the french president is a de jure dictator and has all legal means to become a de facto one very easily. In that case, the french president is the one who decides alone who is the prime minister. The theory that he had to pick a NFP prime minister is rooted in an unofficial tradition that was upheld by his predecessors but only because they thought it was a smart move to play compromises. Macron doesn't need any real changes to have full power, he's simply the first one to actually abuse the full potential of the constitution
The theory that he had to pick a NFP prime minister is rooted in an unofficial tradition that was upheld by his predecessors but only because they thought it was a smart move to play compromises.
The fun part is that it is absolutely legal and constitutional to do so. Generally the french president is a de jure dictator and has all legal means to become a de facto one very easily. In that case, the french president is the one who decides alone who is the prime minister. The theory that he had to pick a NFP prime minister is rooted in an unofficial tradition that was upheld by his predecessors but only because they thought it was a smart move to play compromises. Macron doesn't need any real changes to have full power, he's simply the first one to actually abuse the full potential of the constitution
A lasting gift from DeGaulle
Idk if Stalin every tried but not shooting DeGaulle was a rar Stalin L.
DeGaulle being rabidly anti-Anglo was his only redeeming quality.
Well DeGaulle was better left alive as a wedge between the allies, Churchill hated him so much he preferred Vichy France.
Did churchill ever meet a fascist he did,kt like, though?
It's funny how it's always the liberals who lay the political groundwork for fascists taking power.
And that's a wrap. Liberals will 100% support.
Exactly, legalism proving to be the root of fascist takeover again