• Hexboare [they/them]
    ·
    22 days ago

    bullshit math wizardry are they pulling out of their ass to argue that the exact ranking of each individual candidate

    If you're voting in an election with ten candidates, but you only like two of them and equally despise the other eight, the "maths impossibility" arises because you'll have to put a candidate you hate third

    • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Couldn't you just not write a third? This makes no sense to me unless you strictly enforce having a third choice being necessary, which seems random and needless. If someone can just not have a third candidate, or not have a second candidate, I see no reason why that would negatively affect the system. Their vote is just lost if neither of their candidates win with their votes, same as if they didn't go to vote in the first place.

      • Hexboare [they/them]
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yes, in Australian Senate elections you only need to rank at least 6 parties above the line or at least 12 individual candidates below the line on the long ballot paper

        Show

        In practice you might rank all ~100 candidates to try and avoid a couple candidates you hate the most

        • keepcarrot [she/her]
          ·
          21 days ago

          I usually just go with the party and stop at 6 or the first major party (that kinda acts like a big wall)