• xiaohongshu [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It took 30 years for T-72 to finally get its revenge.

    During the 1991 Gulf War, the Soviet made T-72 tanks suffered a severe reputation loss, when thousands of Iraqi T-72M (the export, stripped down version of T-72A) laid burning in the desert. Even though only a fraction of them were actually knocked out by M1A1 Abrams, and most of the losses were due to US air superiority, a well organized propaganda campaign was run to depict Soviet military equipments as so overhyped that they turned out to be complete trash.

    It was a total propaganda victory for the American military industrial complex. In fact, the reputation of the T-72 was so bad that Russia had to rename its successor “T-72BU” (Project 188) to “T-90” to avoid the association. (T-90 is still one of the best performing tanks that have since taken on the British Challenger and German Leopards in the Ukraine War).

    It would be more than 30 years before the T-72s would face the M1 Abrams on the battlefield once more, and this time - we finally have a good picture (literal photographs) of how the M1 Abrams fared against the T-72s without air support. History has finally vindicated the Soviet design - still one of the best designed tanks to exist today despite its age.

      • dinklesplein [any, he/him]
        ·
        24 hours ago

        it's slightly cope to say that the iraqi army was incompetent imo

        like it was probably about as good as the nva, coalition just had an enormous advantage in sensors tech. proto-digital army vs analog army

    • newacctidk [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      can I see the pictures?

      found some of the aftermath

      Show

      could someone tell me what exactly I am seeing in this video? https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1766891196989706377/video/2

      • someone [comrade/them, they/them]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The 2nd video looks like the footage was taken through a very long telephoto lens, using a tree as cover, doing the usual lens-compression effect you get with long telephotos. I'm wondering if it's a mirror lens like one of those generic 500mm f/8 ones. That ugly ringed effect can happen under the right exposure circumstances.