With this project falling behind, and the reducing likelihood of delays in the Lunar Gateway/Artemis program, I think there's a good chance that NASA and the ESA will not have access to a space station following the ISS's decommission. It's not the only "public-private" partnership for an ISS successor, but I don't think the other candidates are making much progress either.

I also thought that this quote was pretty amusing, and highlights the futility of trying to privately fund commercial station projects:

To bring in some much-needed cash, Axiom Space started selling seats for trips to the ISS on board SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft.

It was also awarded a NASA contract to fund a space suit for the first crewed mission to the lunar surface, Artemis III.

But the suit appears to have been a massive distraction — not to mention a major money pit — from its plans to build a space station. SpaceX trips to the existing orbital outpost were also not a sustainable solution to Axiom Space's woes.

"Turns out that there's not a lot of billionaires that want to set aside their life for 18 months to go train to be an astronaut for the ISS," a former Axiom executive told Forbes.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The bazinga car commercial in space moment was deeply demoralizing to me, and even on Hexbear there were some "I'm a leftist butt " treat defenders trying to justify that aforementioned publicly-subsidized bazinga car commercial in space with bullshit excuses like "it was a payload test for the mission(tm) and they decided to have a little fun with the payload test, did you expect them to not have fun?" bootlicker

    The answer is yes. I didn't ask to subsidize a fucking bazinga car commercial in space.

    If the Apollo moon landing had a mandatory Coca-Cola sign installation moment "for fun" that'd have been crushing for me too.

    • CascadeOfLight [he/him]
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I would support the use of a nuclear weapon in space if it was used to evaporate that car xi-plz

    • buckykat [none/use name]
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They just couldn't think of a single better use for three thousand pounds of payload to solar orbit, right, sure.

      The Falcon 9/heavy is the best amerikkkan launch system since Saturn but that's not a high bar.

      • anonochronomus [comrade/them, she/her]
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Considering the Saturn rocket program was run pretty much entirely by paperclipped nazis, I'm gonna have to go ahead and say "nothing new under the sun."

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I'd have accepted pretty much anything but an obnoxious flex from a private corporation and its products.

        • buckykat [none/use name]
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Call like any university and say "hey you got 3000 pounds of shit you want on a solar orbit? It might blow up, this is a test flight" And the answer will be "Yes, absolutely!"

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I would have been fine with that. It may have actually promoted the bazinga corporation more than a narcissistic product flex, but this was my-hero