Uhh. As (bad, barely trained) archeologist I can assure you there's no such thing as a "man's" bone structure and the shape of your bones can at most provide clues as to your reproductive characteristics. The shape of the skeleton alone is not sufficient to establish reproductive role by itself in many cases, especially when the skeleton is fragmentary and incomplete.
Yeah, preaching to the choir here. As usual, the chuds don't care about the actual science, just the elementary school level understanding that could be implied to support their false worldview
Uhh. As (bad, barely trained) archeologist I can assure you there's no such thing as a "man's" bone structure and the shape of your bones can at most provide clues as to your reproductive characteristics. The shape of the skeleton alone is not sufficient to establish reproductive role by itself in many cases, especially when the skeleton is fragmentary and incomplete.
You tankes deny basic biology!
Yeah, preaching to the choir here. As usual, the chuds don't care about the actual science, just the elementary school level understanding that could be implied to support their false worldview
Everything is "Bio 101 says this" and "Econ 101 says that" because they stopped learning after that
Woooooooooooooord.