Permanently Deleted

  • UlyssesT
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I absolutely hate that argument, it would mean gambling addiction is not real. In other words: one of the most harmful addictions to public health is not an addiction by that definition, because there's no "biological dependency".

      • UlyssesT
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • The_sleepy_woke_dialectic [he/him]
          ·
          26 days ago

          Wait we had a struggle session about gambling of all things?? How are you going to be anti-capitalist and pro-gambling industry?

          • UlyssesT
            hexagon
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            deleted by creator

      • Belly_Beanis [he/him]
        ·
        25 days ago

        no biological dependency

        ....which is a weird claim to make since gambling addiction is 50~70% genetic. The genetic factors have been known for a long time. Here's a study from a decade ago in Nature where they compared addiction genes in rats with addiction genes in humans:

        Nature.com

        At the bottom of the page you can find other studies done on the links between genetics and gambling addiction. A lot of overlap with the genetics that make people more prone to alcohol and drug addiction.