I'm guessing it's like Christianity where there are leftist Christians who follow Jesus' more progressive messages such as giving to the less fortunate and healing the sick, and then there are the scary Christian evangelicals that want A Handmaids Tale and conversion therapy. Logically, Islam probably isn't a monolith in a similar way other religions aren't.

However, I have never heard about what those of the Islamic faith actually believe outside of the hysterical post 9/11 Islamophobia I've been indoctrinated with as a child.

I want to know what the truth is and hear the other sides story. To me it's obvious that Islamophobia is wrong, however when Islamophobes make wild claims about it, I can't really refute them confidently because I'm simply ignorant of the facts. Please educate my dumb, white ass.

  • boboblaw [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    21 days ago

    you are not the authority of "true" christianity.

    I'm not the authority of Christianity, that would be Christ. Christianity is the teachings of Christ, yes?

    I don't think any of the above is controversial, so I hope we can agree on this basic definition.

    And yes, the teachings of Christ include what one could argue is the "worship of a genocidal entity".

    But do you not feel utterly ridiculous?

    Like your immediate response to the sermon on the mount is "fuck you you worship a genocidal entity"?

    Your immediate response to John Brown is "bro you worship a genocidal entity"?

    Your immediate response to Malcolm X is "you worship a genocidal entity (and in the worst way bc Islam)"?

    Can you so casually dismiss every religious person who has fought, struggled and died for a just cause? Because they believed in the Abrahamic god, while you're here smugly patting yourself on the back for having the correct opinions?

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
      ·
      19 days ago

      Can you so casually dismiss every religious person who has fought, struggled and died for a just cause? Because they believed in the Abrahamic god, while you're here smugly patting yourself on the back for having the correct opinions?

      there were or are religious people on the other side of all of those conflict. john brown was good because of the side he was on but venerating religious fanaticism is fucking dangerous because he could've read a different part of the book and been pro-slavery based on the literal instructions on who and how the israelites were instructed to keep slaves.

      jesus never wrote anything down, the supposed gospels were written decades later and canonized centuries later. there's no basis for you or anyone else to say what version of the religion is "correct" or "authentic".

      this is wildly off-topic from OP's question.

      • boboblaw [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        19 days ago

        john brown was good because of the side he was on but venerating religious fanaticism is fucking dangerous because he could've read a different part of the book

        He doesn't sound good at all by your reckoning. He just happened to be "on the right side" after flipping a book to a random section and believing utterly what he read. He was just a crazy person. Like Nat Turner and Louverture. Getting themselves killed just because they read the wrong section of a book.

        Anyway, how'd it turn out for the people who flipped to the Israelite slavery how-to section? Did any go out and risk their lives to capture some Canaanites or whatever? Did any just reject it, become atheists, and then go start a slave rebellion?

        jesus never wrote anything down, the supposed gospels were written decades later and canonized centuries later.

        True, I can't claim to know anything for sure about the historical Jesus. But he's at least a literary character and you say the works were canonized. So we can at least speak of him in the way people can argue over what Darth Vader said.

        this is wildly off-topic from OP's question.

        Maybe so. Would it be sufficiently on topic to say "Islam is pro-slavery because it endorses the Torah, which teaches the proper ways of buying and selling slaves"?

        • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
          ·
          19 days ago

          "Islam is pro-slavery because it endorses the Torah, which teaches the proper ways of buying and selling slaves"?

          i'm not familiar with specific doctrine or how the official slave trade ended in the islamic world. it is a severe criticism of all abrahamic religions that they claim what they claim about god and morality yet are compatible with slavery. this is not unique to islam and i wouldn't bother bringing it up in a discussion about contemporary expressions of patriarchy and homophboia