Now that they've lost, since all libs claimed that supporting genocide was just for the elections, kamala will start to campaign hard against genocide, won't she? Won't she?!
I see a lot of that lol. It's honestly impressive how quickly they can go from supporting a thing, to wishing they'd supported that thing instead of opposing it.
Now that they've lost, since all libs claimed that supporting genocide was just for the elections, kamala will start to campaign hard against genocide, won't she? Won't she?!
Or they'll claim that failing to support the genocide cost them the election (as seen in another thread) >.>
hey, the genocide is important for us geopolitics, ok?
I see a lot of that lol. It's honestly impressive how quickly they can go from supporting a thing, to wishing they'd supported that thing instead of opposing it.
Not a chance until trump is either sworn in or does something bad. Until that happens they'll be ignoring it.
Even then it's probably not gonna happen until 10yrs + like Iraq war