Article: https://web.archive.org/web/20241120151906/https://www.foxnews.com/media/popular-video-platform-twitch-aimed-teens-young-adults-rife-terrorist-propaganda-extremism

Non-archive link: https://www.foxnews.com/media/popular-video-platform-twitch-aimed-teens-young-adults-rife-terrorist-propaganda-extremism

Also, archive.org lets you archive new pages again party-blob

  • carpoftruth [any, any]M
    ·
    13 hours ago

    When two mods are online at the same time, both banning and removing the same posts

    milhouse so this is what it feels like when doves cry

    • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A little bit of feedback for you (please take this as gentle ribbing and nothing more): I would have left this lib unbanned long enough to see the response to my comment and, more succinctly/clearly the comment by Babs below. Because I think we (especially Babs, actually) really got to the root of the "misunderstanding" (it well might have been intentional, that's what I want to know!). And I would have been curious to see their response, because I want to know if they were actually being obtuse on purpose (likely) or if it was an honest misunderstanding (unlikely). But now because our hexbear mods are so online and ban-happy (again, I mean this in a friendly way, I'm usually glad you're online and ban-happy), we will never know, and I'm a little sad about that. (That last little bit is 100% sincere, I really would have liked to see how the lib would have responded to me, but mostly Babs, because her comment says what I was trying to say, but better.)

      • carpoftruth [any, any]M
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Fair enough, noted. I'll keep the educational potential in mind a bit more.

      • Babs [she/her]
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If he was being intentionally obtuse (likely) I wanted to drag that out of him. With patient explanations.