I may be misreading the statistics, but shouldn't "relationship of victim to offender" imply that the Wife category denotes 563 wives of killers?? I don't know if the chart got something turned around somewhere.
Which makes sense, yes. I'm saying, since the start of the thread, that the chart title, the bar labels, and the text on the statista page are conflicting with each other which makes the whole thing look unprofessional.
I may be misreading the statistics, but shouldn't "relationship of victim to offender" imply that the Wife category denotes 563 wives of killers?? I don't know if the chart got something turned around somewhere.
Ohhhh you're right. I was reading it wrong. Damn I'm not bright haha
Well you say that, but your name is Dirt_Owl not Dumb_Owl so jot that down. To quote the chart
so the bar titles denote the killer not the victim. I'm confused
See this is why I hate graphs.
12 employers were murdered by their employees
That would make sense, but that's what it says verbatim
yes, which means the victim is (employer of) offender. the offender killed their employer.
Which makes sense, yes. I'm saying, since the start of the thread, that the chart title, the bar labels, and the text on the statista page are conflicting with each other which makes the whole thing look unprofessional.
ok nvm I see what you mean. the bottom text is wrong and should be reversed.
I did the exact same thing, and my bullshit meter went off the charts